Radiological and surgical outcomes after graduation to posterior spinal fusion surgery following magnetically controlled growing rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with early-onset scoliosis who underwent magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) treatment followed by posterior spinal fusion (PSF) |
| I — Intervention | Posterior spinal fusion surgery following MCGR treatment |
| C — Comparator | Pre-PSF radiographic parameters (within-subject comparison) |
| O — Outcomes | Radiographic parameters (main curve magnitude, thoracic kyphosis, T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths), surgical outcomes, and complication rates |
Bottom Line
This systematic review provides preliminary evidence that posterior spinal fusion following magnetically controlled growing rod treatment can achieve significant radiographic improvements in early-onset scoliosis patients, with a 17.2% complication rate. However, the evidence base is limited by small, retrospective studies without control groups. While PSF appears to be a viable treatment option, the necessity and optimal timing of definitive fusion remains unclear. The single-arm design prevents comparison with continued MCGR treatment or other alternatives. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously, as the decision for PSF should be individualised based on patient factors, curve progression, and family preferences. The authors appropriately call for larger prospective studies with standardised reporting to better define the role of final fusion in MCGR-treated patients.
Key Findings
P Value: p < 0.05 for all radiographic parameters
Effect Size: Not specified in abstract
Primary Outcome: Significant improvements in all radiographic parameters following PSF
Nnt Or Sensitivity: 17.2% pooled postoperative complication rate
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
PSF following MCGR appears technically feasible with acceptable complication rates, though requires specialised paediatric spinal surgery expertise Relevant to Australian paediatric orthopaedic practice, though MCGR availability may be limited by PBS funding and requires consideration within established spinal deformity centres Paediatric patients with early-onset scoliosis who have undergone MCGR treatment and are being considered for definitive spinal fusion
Abstract
PURPOSE: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is a challenging condition for spinal surgeons. Growing rods represent the standard treatment for patients requiring surgery, and magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are increasingly adopted. Many patients ultimately transition to posterior spinal fusion (PSF), although the necessity of definitive fusion remains debated. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aimed to evaluate radiographic and surgical outcomes of PSF following MCGR treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies were identified using a PIO (Population, Intervention, Outcome) framework. Extracted data included demographic, radiographic, and surgical outcomes, including complications. A single-arm meta-analysis compared pre- and post-PSF radiographic parameters (main curve magnitude, thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths). Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS tool. RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies were included (370 patients), of which six were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvements in all radiographic parameters (main curve magnitude, TK, T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths, p < 0.05). The pooled overall postoperative complication rate after PSF was 17.2%. CONCLUSIONS: PSF appears to be a viable treatment option following MCGR, providing significant deformity correction with a relatively acceptable complication rate. Nevertheless, the current evidence is limited by small, retrospective cohorts. Larger, prospective studies with standardized reporting of surgical variables and clinical outcomes are needed to better define the role of final fusion and to optimize treatment protocols.
References
- 1.Brigato, P., Oggiano, L., Ravaioli, C., De Salvatore, S., Sangiovanni, G. M., Palombi, D., Sessa, S., Costici, P. F., Saran, N., & Albert Ouellet, J. (2026). Radiological and surgical outcomes after graduation to posterior spinal fusion surgery following magnetically controlled growing rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00801-y
Related Research
Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
Non-operative management of traumatic occipitocervical distraction injuries in children: a systematic review
31 July 2026
Spine
Differentiating Spinal Deformity Versus Leg Length Discrepancy in Patients With Pelvic Obliquity : Systematic Review of Diagnostic Methods, Imaging, and Clinical Management
16 June 2026
Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)
Quiescence in the resting zone of the growth plate: a systematic review
30 Apr 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service