Prognostic factors in malaria patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Malaria patients with acute kidney injury |
| I — Intervention | Presence of various clinical and laboratory abnormalities |
| C — Comparator | Absence of these clinical and laboratory abnormalities |
| O — Outcomes | Mortality in malaria patients with AKI |
Bottom Line
This meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 1,104 malaria patients with AKI identifies key prognostic factors for mortality. The strongest predictors include ventilator requirement (OR: 30.35), respiratory distress syndrome (OR: 18.50), and hypotension (OR: 18.23). Other significant factors include neurological involvement, DIC, oliguria, and various laboratory abnormalities. While the findings provide valuable prognostic information, the analysis lacks important methodological details including confidence intervals, heterogeneity assessment, and evidence certainty grading. For Australian clinicians, these findings are most relevant in travel medicine and infectious disease settings when managing returned travellers with severe malaria complications.
Key Findings
P Value: All significant factors p < 0.05, strongest associations p < 0.001
Effect Size: Multiple prognostic factors identified with ORs ranging from 3.41 to 30.35
Primary Outcome: Mortality in malaria patients with acute kidney injury
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Ventilator requirement strongest predictor (OR: 30.35), followed by respiratory distress (OR: 18.50) and hypotension (OR: 18.23)
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
Prognostic factors are readily identifiable in clinical practice Relevant for travel medicine clinics, infectious disease specialists, and emergency departments managing returned travellers; limited direct applicability due to low local malaria incidence Malaria patients with AKI in endemic areas and travel medicine settings
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the predictors of mortality in malaria patients with AKI. Studies were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Ebsco, and ScienceDirect. We included observational studies that showed the association between clinical or laboratory abnormalities and mortality, reported in odds ratio. The quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using R. Sixteen studies with 1,104 patients were analyzed. Factors significantly associated with mortality were respiratory distress syndrome (OR: 18.50, p < 0.001), neurological involvement (OR: 12.83, p < 0.001), disseminated intravascular coagulation (OR: 12.00, p < 0.001), hypotension (OR: 18.23, p < 0.001), oliguria (OR: 3.41, p = 0.002), ventilator requirement (OR: 30.35, p < 0.001), leukocytosis (OR: 4.87, p = 0.003), hyponatremia (OR: 3.67, p = 0.048), acidosis (OR: 4.88, p < 0.001), hyperkalemia (OR: 3.99, p < 0.001), and jaundice (OR: 5.03, p = 0.001). ARDS, neurological involvement, DIC, hypotension, oliguria, ventilator requirement, leukocytosis, hyponatremia, acidosis, hyperkalemia, and jaundice were associated with mortality in malaria patients with AKI. The findings underscored the importance of heightened awareness and vigilance in managing patients with these conditions.
References
- 1.Tear, A. A., Fauziah, N., Riswari, S. F., Purba, A. R., Akhlaq, M. M., & Susanto, N. H. (2026). Prognostic factors in malaria patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta analysis. Renal Failure. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2026.2665050
Related Research
Journal of medical Internet research
Advancing Human-Centered AI in Clinical Decision Support: Sociocognitive Human-in-the-Loop Study in HIV Care
2 Aug 2026
JBJS reviews
One-Stage or Two-Stage Revision for Infected Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
30 July 2026
Signal transduction and targeted therapy
Mucosal immunity and vaccine development
27 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service