Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Prevalence of GJB2 gene mutations in nonsyndromic hearing impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis

MedicineFeng, Ruijie, Mangantig, Ernest, Wan Yusoff, Wan Shahriman Yushdie et al.29 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

80CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment (NSHI) across global populations
I — InterventionGJB2 gene mutation testing and analysis
C — ComparatorGeographic regions and ethnic populations
O — OutcomesPrevalence of GJB2 mutations and five specific hotspot variants (c.35delG, c.176_191del16, c.235delC, c.299_300delAT, and c.109G > A)

Bottom Line

This meta-analysis of 51 studies covering nearly 19,000 patients confirms that GJB2 mutations cause approximately one-quarter of nonsyndromic hearing impairment cases globally, but with marked geographic variation (11.1% in Africa to 38.5% in Middle East). The extremely high heterogeneity (I² = 96%) limits confidence in the pooled estimate, but regional data support population-specific genetic screening strategies. For Australian clinicians, this evidence supports targeted GJB2 testing in appropriate patients, particularly focusing on the c.235delC and c.35delG variants. The findings reinforce the importance of genetic counselling and early molecular diagnosis for hereditary hearing loss, enabling appropriate family planning advice and potential early intervention strategies.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported

  • Effect Size: 25.9% pooled prevalence

  • Primary Outcome: Overall GJB2 mutation prevalence in nonsyndromic hearing impairment

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Diagnostic yield varies by region: Middle East 38.5%, Africa 11.1%; c.235delC most common variant at 15.2%

  • Confidence Interval: 95% CI: 21.7-30.1%

Clinical Application

Genetic testing for GJB2 mutations is readily available in Australian pathology services Relevant for Australian genetic counselling services and may inform PBS-funded genetic testing protocols. Aligns with RACGP guidelines for hereditary hearing loss assessment and family planning counselling Patients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment requiring genetic counselling and molecular diagnosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic hearing impairment (NSHI) is the most common type of inherited hearing loss. Mutations in GJB2, which encodes connexin 26, are a major cause worldwide, but their prevalence and variant distribution vary across populations. To systematically evaluate the global prevalence of GJB2 mutations and 5 hotspot variants (c.35delG, c.176_191del16, c.235delC, c.299_300delAT, and c.109G > A) in NSHI patients, and assess their diagnostic relevance. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted on studies published between January 2019 and June 2024 retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Only high-quality studies (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale ≥ 7) with molecular diagnostic data were included. Pooled prevalence, 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity (I2) were calculated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed according to geographic region. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies from 24 countries covering 18,968 patients with NSHI were included. The overall prevalence of GJB2 mutations was 25.9% (95% confidence intervals: 21.7-30.1%; I2 = 96%). The variant-specific rates included c.235delC (15.2%), c.35delG (12.0%), c.109G > A (7.6%), c.299_300delAT (3.1%), and c.176_191del16 (0.7%). The highest prevalence occurred in the Middle East (38.5%), whereas Africa had the lowest (11.1%). CONCLUSION: GJB2 mutations show marked geographic and ethnic variability in populations with NSHI. These findings support region-specific genetic screening to improve the early diagnosis, counseling, and targeted interventions for hereditary hearing loss.

References

  1. 1.Feng, R., Mangantig, E., Wan Yusoff, W. S., Li, H., Li, X., & Abu, M. N. (2026). Prevalence of GJB2 gene mutations in nonsyndromic hearing impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, 105(22), e48877. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000048877
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service