Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Predictors for Unsuccessful Outcome of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the 2 Randomized NORDSTEN Trials

SpineNomeland, Aline A, Brekke, Erik A M, Seip, Andreas O et al.15 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

75CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationAdults with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing surgery, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (n=704)
I — InterventionSurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis
C — ComparatorVarious baseline prognostic factors (symptom duration, psychological distress, disc degeneration grade)
O — OutcomesUnsuccessful outcome defined as <30% reduction in Oswestry Disability Index at 2 years

Bottom Line

This large Norwegian cohort study identifies three key predictors of unsuccessful lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: symptom duration exceeding 12 months (2.6-fold increased risk), psychological distress, and advanced disc degeneration. Notably, traditional factors like age, BMI, and smoking were not predictive. These findings support early surgical intervention for appropriate candidates and highlight the importance of addressing psychological comorbidities. The 30% ODI improvement threshold provides a clinically meaningful benchmark for success. While the study lacks external validation, the large sample from high-quality RCTs strengthens the evidence. Clinicians should incorporate these factors into preoperative counselling and shared decision-making, particularly emphasising that prolonged conservative management may reduce surgical success rates.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: All significant predictors p<0.05

  • Effect Size: Symptom duration >12 months: OR 2.58; Psychological distress: OR 1.60; Advanced disc degeneration: OR 1.98

  • Primary Outcome: Unsuccessful outcome (<30% ODI improvement at 2 years)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Hazard ratios suggest 60-158% increased risk for unsuccessful outcomes

  • Confidence Interval: 95% CIs: 1.54-4.29, 1.01-2.53, 1.26-3.12 respectively

Clinical Application

Readily applicable - all predictors assessable in routine clinical practice Highly relevant to Australian spine surgery practice; predictors align with RACGP musculoskeletal guidelines emphasising psychological factors and symptom chronicity Adults with lumbar spinal stenosis being considered for surgical intervention

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential predictors of unsuccessful outcomes after surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LSS is a common cause of disability in adults and the leading indication for spine surgery in Norway. Despite advances in surgical techniques, nearly one-third of patients report either minor or no improvement or worsening of symptoms after surgery. Identifying predictors of unsuccessful outcomes is essential for improving patient selection and shared decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This secondary analysis used data from the 2 NORwegian Degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal STENosis (NORDSTEN) randomized trials, which included 704 surgically treated patients with LSS, with (n=267) or without (n=437) degenerative spondylolisthesis. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was the primary outcome measure. A reduction in ODI score of <30% from baseline to 2 years postoperatively was defined as an unsuccessful outcome. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate whether carefully selected baseline variables were associated with an unsuccessful outcome at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Longer duration of radiating pain (>12 mo; OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.54-4.29), psychological distress (HSCL-25 ≥1.75; OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01-2.53), and advanced disc degeneration (Pfirrmann grades 4-5; OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.26-3.12) were independently associated with an unsuccessful outcome. Commonly discussed factors such as age, BMI, smoking, ASA grade, and predominant back pain did not reach statistical significance for association with the outcome. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing surgery for LSS, longer symptom duration, psychological distress, and advanced disc degeneration were associated with a higher risk of unsuccessful postoperative outcomes.

References

  1. 1.Nomeland, A. A., Brekke, E. A. M., Seip, A. O., Myklebust, T. Å., Ebbs, E. K., Solberg, T., Hermansen, E., Indrekvam, K., Storheim, K., Alhaug, O. K., Weber, C., Hellum, C., Franssen, E., Ljøstad, I., Brisby, H., Furunes, H., Lilleholt, E., & Austevoll, I. M. (2026). Predictors for unsuccessful outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: A secondary analysis of the 2 randomized NORDSTEN trials. *Spine*, *51*(8). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005642
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service