Predicting molecular types of adult-type diffuse gliomas based on MRI reports with large language models
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 2169 patients diagnosed with adult-type diffuse gliomas (oligodendrogliomas, IDH-mutant astrocytomas, IDH-wildtype glioblastomas) from four hospitals in Asia and Europe, July 2005-March 2024 |
| I — Intervention | Seven large language models (GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4.1-mini, Llama 3.1 8B/70B, Qwen2.5 7B, Deepseek-r1 8B, Mistral 7B) with knowledge-based prompts |
| C — Comparator | Same LLMs with naïve prompts (without domain-specific knowledge) |
| O — Outcomes | Accuracy in predicting molecular glioma types according to 2021 WHO classification; impact of radiologist subspecialisation and report quality |
Bottom Line
This large multicentre study demonstrates that large language models can achieve clinically meaningful accuracy (78-79%) in predicting glioma molecular types from MRI reports when provided with domain-specific knowledge. The performance was consistently better with reports from neuro-oncology specialists and high-quality, descriptive reports. While promising for preoperative planning, the technology requires careful validation in local settings and integration with existing workflows. The 20-30% error rate means LLM predictions should complement, not replace, definitive molecular testing. Australian implementation would need consideration of regulatory requirements and standardised reporting practices to achieve optimal performance.
Key Findings
P Value: p < 0.001 for significant improvements with knowledge-based prompts
Effect Size: Knowledge-based prompts improved accuracy by 2-27% depending on model (GPT-4o-mini: 77.0% vs 79.1%)
Primary Outcome: LLM accuracy in predicting glioma molecular types
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Best-performing models achieved 78-79% accuracy with knowledge-based prompts
Confidence Interval: Not explicitly reported for accuracy measures
Clinical Application
Requires access to commercial LLMs and standardised MRI reporting protocols; implementation challenges in routine practice Relevant to Australian neuro-oncology practice where molecular classification guides treatment decisions; would need integration with existing radiology information systems and consideration of TGA regulations for AI medical devices Adult patients with suspected diffuse gliomas requiring preoperative molecular classification
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in predicting molecular types of adult-type diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO classification using MRI radiology reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 2169 patients diagnosed with adult-type diffuse gliomas (294 oligodendrogliomas, 295 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, and 1580 IDH-wildtype glioblastomas) between July 2005 and March 2024 from four hospitals in Asia and Europe. Seven proprietary and open-source LLMs were assessed: GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4.1-mini, Llama 3.1 8B, Llama 3.1 70B, Qwen2.5 7B, Deepseek-r1 8B, and Mistal 7B. The performance of LLMs in classifying molecular types was compared based on the provision of relevant knowledge of glioma imaging findings (knowledge-based vs. naïve prompt). The impact of radiologists' subspecialization in neuro-oncology, report quality, and reporting language on LLMs' performance was also evaluated. RESULTS: LLMs achieved significantly higher (naïve vs. knowledge-based; GPT-4o-mini, 77.0% vs. 79.1%, p < 0.001; Qwen2.5 7B, 75.9% vs. 79.5%, p < 0.001; Deepseek-r1 8B, 66.0% vs. 73.2%, p < 0.001) or comparable accuracy (GPT-4.1-mini, 78.7% vs. 78.6%; Llama 3.1 70B, 78.0% vs. 78.1%; Mistral 7B, 58.4% vs. 57.4%) using knowledge-based prompt compared to naïve prompt, except for Llama 3.1 8B (65.4% vs. 44.6%, p < 0.001). Differences in accuracy were more pronounced in smaller-sized LLMs. Additionally, the accuracy was significantly higher with reports by neuro-oncology specialists and high-quality reports in all LLMs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LLMs may provide preoperative information on the tumor types of adult-type diffuse gliomas from MRI reports by providing relevant knowledge in the prompt. Informative and descriptive reports could further enhance LLMs' performance. KEY POINTS: Question Our study aimed to evaluate large language models' (LLMs) ability to efficiently predict molecular types of adult-type diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO classification. Findings Larger models generally showed better accuracy and were less sensitive to domain-specific knowledge. Their performance improved when using high-quality, longer reports or reports by neuro-oncology specialists. Clinical relevance These findings highlight the potential role of LLMs in predicting glioma molecular types, underscoring the importance of informative and descriptive reports in enhancing their performance.
References
- 1.Suh, P. S., Lee, D., Bang, C. B., Han, K., Choi, K. S., Kim, M., Park, J. E., Shin, N. Y., Ahn, S. S., Choi, S. H., Kim, H. S., Lee, S. K., Chang, J. H., Kim, S. H., Foltyn-Dumitru, M., You, S. C., Vollmuth, P., Kim, B. H., & Park, Y. W. (2026). Predicting molecular types of adult-type diffuse gliomas based on MRI reports with large language models. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01530-4
Related Research
Neurosurgical review
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients
31 July 2026
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Patient experiences of tissue donation and digital consent support in primary craniospinal tumour research.
19 July 2026
NeuroImage
Rapid multi-parametric quantitative MRI via deep learning-based synthetic-to-real reconstruction and 3D SSFP-MOLED imaging
17 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service