Placebo Effects in Alcohol, Cocaine, and Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults with substance use disorders (alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine use disorder) |
| I — Intervention | Placebo treatment |
| C — Comparator | Pre-treatment baseline craving scores |
| O — Outcomes | Changes in craving scores measured by standardized mean differences |
Bottom Line
This meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (n=495) found that placebo treatment significantly reduced craving scores in alcohol use disorder (SMD=0.93, 95% CI 0.33-1.54) but not in cocaine or methamphetamine use disorders. The evidence base is severely limited, with only 2 studies each for cocaine and methamphetamine disorders, resulting in wide confidence intervals and substantial uncertainty. The absence of quality assessment, heterogeneity evaluation, or sensitivity analyses further limits confidence in these findings. While the results suggest meaningful placebo effects in alcohol use disorder that may inform trial design and clinical expectations, the evidence is insufficient to guide clinical practice changes. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously, particularly for stimulant use disorders where the evidence remains highly uncertain.
Key Findings
P Value: Statistically significant only for alcohol use disorder
Effect Size: Alcohol: SMD=0.93; Cocaine: SMD=0.61; Methamphetamine: SMD=0.44
Primary Outcome: Standardized mean difference in craving scores pre-post placebo treatment
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Large effect size for alcohol (SMD=0.93), moderate for cocaine and methamphetamine but with substantial uncertainty
Confidence Interval: Alcohol: 95% CI 0.33-1.54; Cocaine: 95% CI -1.41-2.62; Methamphetamine: 95% CI -3.43-4.32
Clinical Application
Limited by small evidence base and uncertainty in effect estimates for most substance types Relevant to Australian addiction medicine practice but limited by lack of quality assessment and small study numbers; may inform PBS-funded treatment expectations Adults with alcohol use disorder in clinical trial settings; limited evidence for cocaine and methamphetamine use disorders
Abstract
Objective: The placebo effect is established in psychiatry, yet its role in substance use disorders (SUDs) treatment remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in craving scores in placebo groups in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across different SUDs in adults. Data sources: Eight different databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Academic Search) were systematically searched up to October 28, 2024, by 2 independent researchers. Study selection: Placebo-controlled, double-blind RCTs assessing craving in patients with SUDs were included based on predefined eligibility criteria, published in English, Dutch, Spanish, or German language. Search terms were a combination and synonyms of "craving," "addiction," and "placebo." From a total of 1945 unique records identified, 9 articles met our eligibility criteria. Data extraction: Data on demographic characteristics, study design, and outcome results were extracted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for pre-post craving scores within each placebo group; a positive difference point towards improvement in the postplacebo period. Results: A total of n=495 placebo-treated participants were included from nine RCTs in three different SUDs (n=300 in alcohol, n=88 in cocaine, and n=107 in methamphetamine use disorder). Craving scores significantly decreased over time (meaning symptom improvement) in the placebo treatment group in alcohol use disorder (5 studies, SMD=0.93 [95% CI=0.33 to 1.54]) but did not reach statistical significance in cocaine use disorder (2 studies, SMD=0.61 [95% CI=-1.41 to 2.62]) or in (meth)amphetamine use disorder (2 studies, SMD=0.44 [95% CI=-3.43 to 4.32]). Conclusions: Placebo treatment led to reductions in craving scores across all three SUDs, although statistical significance was achieved only in alcohol use disorder. Given the low number of studies for cocaine and (meth)amphetamine use disorder, these estimates were captured with much uncertainty. These findings may inform the design of future RCTs and support the development of more individualized treatment approaches in clinical settings.
References
- 1.van der Meer, P. B., Schoones, J. W., Luykx, J., Dekkers, O. M., Fiocco, M., Kramers, C. K., Schellekens, A., & Batalla, A. (2026). Placebo Effects in Alcohol, Cocaine, and Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. *The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry*. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25r16118
Related Research
PloS one
Integrating smoking cessation into HIV care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and the evidence gap in cost-effectiveness.
1 Aug 2026
Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention
Natural language processing tool for extracting information about opioid overdoses in the USA from case narratives in the violent death reporting system.
21 July 2026
Medicine
Effect of physical exercise on executive function in individuals with substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
19 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service