Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Phase 2 trial of pTVG-HP ± pTVG-AR DNA vaccines and pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Journal for immunotherapy of cancerKyriakopoulos, Christos E, Pachynski, Russell K, Eickhoff, Jens C et al.24 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

50CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — Population60 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
I — InterventionpTVG-HP DNA vaccine alone (Arm A) or pTVG-HP alternating with pTVG-AR DNA vaccine (Arm B), both combined with pembrolizumab
C — ComparatorTwo-arm comparison: single vaccine (pTVG-HP) versus dual vaccine approach (pTVG-HP + pTVG-AR)
O — OutcomesPrimary: 6-month progression-free survival. Secondary: safety, objective response rate, PSA response rate, overall survival, immunological responses

Bottom Line

This phase 2 trial evaluated DNA vaccines targeting prostate cancer antigens combined with pembrolizumab in 60 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The study compared single vaccine (pTVG-HP) versus dual vaccine (pTVG-HP plus pTVG-AR) approaches. Results showed no significant difference between arms, with 6-month progression-free survival rates of 51% versus 45% respectively. Both arms achieved 20% PSA response rates and demonstrated some objective responses (30% in measurable disease subset). The dual vaccine approach showed slightly increased toxicity without improved efficacy. While the treatment showed some anti-tumour activity, the lack of a control arm limits interpretation of clinical benefit. The study provides proof-of-concept for DNA vaccine approaches in prostate cancer but does not establish superiority of the dual vaccine strategy. Further research with larger randomised trials including appropriate controls would be needed before considering clinical implementation.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: p=0.80 for PFS comparison, p=0.16 for OS comparison

  • Effect Size: No significant difference between treatment arms

  • Primary Outcome: 6-month PFS: 51% (Arm A) vs 45% (Arm B)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: PSA decline >50% achieved in 20% of patients in both arms

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Limited by requirement for specialised vaccine preparation and administration protocols Pembrolizumab available on PBS for other cancer types; DNA vaccines would require TGA approval and likely be restricted to clinical trials initially Patients with mCRPC who have exhausted standard therapies and are candidates for immunotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported a trial using pembrolizumab with a DNA vaccine encoding prostatic acid phosphatase (pTVG-HP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Favorable clinical outcomes were associated with T-cell activation, suggesting immune response to vaccination was critical. In the current trial, we evaluated whether immunization with two vaccines, to broaden the T-cell response to other cancer-associated antigens, would elicit greater anti-tumor efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 patients with mCRPC were treated with vaccine on days 1 and 8 of a 3 week cycle, with pembrolizumab given on day 1 of each cycle. Patients in Arm A (n=30) received pTVG-HP as the vaccine, and patients in Arm B (n=30) received pTVG-AR (encoding the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor) alternating with pTVG-HP every two cycles. After eight cycles (6 months), patients continued to receive pembrolizumab alone, with the option to receive further booster immunizations at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. The primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included safety, objective response rate, PSA response rate, overall survival (OS), and immunological evaluations. RESULTS: Overall median time to progression was 24 weeks (24 weeks Arm A, 24 weeks Arm B, p=0.80). The month 6 PFS rate was 51% in Arm A and 45% in Arm B. Median OS was 2.8 years (2.5 years Arm A, 3.7 years Arm B, p=0.16). 20% of patients in each arm experienced a PSA decline of >50%. 20 patients (n=8 Arm A, n=12 Arm B) had measurable disease, and 6/20 (30%) experienced a partial response. Eight patients received booster immunizations after 6 months, 3 of whom subsequently experienced a PSA decline. Three patients in Arm B experienced creatine kinase elevation with or without increased transaminases, which were not observed in Arm A. T cell immune responses to both antigens were detected in patients treated in Arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with DNA vaccines and pembrolizumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity in terms of PSA declines and objective responses. The addition of pTVG-AR did not significantly increase measures of clinical efficacy; however, it was associated with a slight increase in toxicity to tissues that also express AR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04090528.

References

  1. 1.Kyriakopoulos, C. E., Pachynski, R. K., Eickhoff, J. C., Tonelli, T. P., Jeon, D., & McNeel, D. G. (2026). Phase 2 trial of pTVG-HP ± pTVG-AR DNA vaccines and pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, Article jitc-2025-014323. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-014323
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service