PET/CT-Guided Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab plus Chemotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: RATIONALE-213 Final Analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 70 patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) |
| I — Intervention | PET/CT-guided neoadjuvant tislelizumab 200mg IV plus chemotherapy (PET responders) or chemoradiotherapy (PET nonresponders) |
| C — Comparator | Historical controls (no concurrent control group in this single-arm phase II study) |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary: disease-free survival, event-free survival, treatment-related adverse events |
Bottom Line
This phase II study demonstrates promising pathologic complete response rates (30-34%) for PET/CT-guided neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in resectable ESCC. The personalised approach based on early PET response is innovative, though both cohorts achieved similar pCR rates despite different treatment intensities. Grade ≥3 toxicity was substantial (50-83%), particularly neutropenia. While encouraging, these single-arm results require validation in randomised controlled trials before clinical adoption. The approach represents an interesting paradigm for personalised neoadjuvant therapy, but current evidence is insufficient to change standard practice. Australian clinicians should await phase III data and consider tislelizumab availability through special access schemes.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported in abstract
Effect Size: pCR rates comparable between cohorts despite different treatment intensities
Primary Outcome: pCR rate: 30% (95% CI 11.9-54.3) in PET responders; 34.4% (95% CI 18.6-53.2) in PET nonresponders
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Approximately 3-4 patients needed to treat for one pCR based on observed rates
Confidence Interval: Wide CIs reflecting small sample size: 11.9-54.3% and 18.6-53.2%
Clinical Application
Requires PET/CT imaging capability and access to tislelizumab; complex multimodal treatment coordination needed Tislelizumab not currently PBS-listed; would require special access scheme. PET/CT widely available. Approach aligns with emerging personalised cancer care frameworks Patients with resectable ESCC suitable for neoadjuvant therapy, particularly those with adequate performance status
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided neoadjuvant treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: RATIONALE-213, a multicenter, open-label, two-cohort phase II study, enrolled 70 patients with resectable ESCC. After one induction chemotherapy cycle, patients were categorized as PET responders (PET maximum standardized uptake value decrease ≥35%) or PET nonresponders (<35%). Subsequently, all patients received three cycles of tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously. In addition, PET responders received chemotherapy and PET nonresponders received chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: As of October 25, 2024 (median follow-up 25.5 months), pCR rates were 30% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.9-54.3] in PET responders and 34.4% (95% CI, 18.6-53.2) in PET nonresponders. Higher pCR rates were associated with higher baseline programmed cell death ligand 1 tumor area positivity scores in both cohorts. One-year disease-free survival rates were 79% and 74.2%, and event-free survival rates were 87.1% and 67.8%, respectively. Any-grade and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 93.3% and 50% of PET responders and 97.5% and 82.5% of PET nonresponders, with no new safety signals. The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was decreased neutrophil count (36.7% and 70%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab with chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for resectable ESCC yielded promising pCR rates and favorable survival outcomes with a tolerable safety profile in both PET/CT-guided responders and PET nonresponders.
References
- 1.Yang, Y., Yan, X., Jiang, H., Kang, M., Mei, X., Tan, L., Liu, J., Du, W., Shi, Y., Zhang, Z., Liang, L., Liao, Y., & Chen, L. (2026). PET/CT-Guided Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab plus Chemotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: RATIONALE-213 Final Analysis. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-2367
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service