Research Appraisalobservational

Performance of a large language model on the reasoning tasks of a physician.

Science (New York, N.Y.)Brodeur, Peter G, Buckley, Thomas A, Kanjee, Zahir et al.30 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

55CEBM
Evidence: Insufficientobservational

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPhysicians and emergency department patients at a major tertiary academic medical center
I — InterventionLarge language model (LLM) clinical decision support
C — ComparatorHuman physician baseline performance and expert second opinions
O — OutcomesClinical reasoning performance on diagnostic cases and real-world emergency department decision-making accuracy

Bottom Line

This study reports that a large language model outperformed physicians on clinical reasoning tasks across multiple experiments, including real-world emergency department cases. However, the abstract provides insufficient detail for proper critical appraisal. Key missing information includes quantitative results, statistical significance, outcome definitions, and methodology for case selection and performance measurement. While the findings suggest potential for AI-assisted clinical decision-making, the lack of detailed results limits confidence in clinical applicability. Australian clinicians should await full publication and consider regulatory, legal, and practical implementation challenges before adopting such technology. Prospective randomised trials with patient-centred outcomes are needed to establish clinical utility and safety.

Evidence: Insufficient

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported

  • Effect Size: Not quantified in abstract - described as LLM 'outperformed physician baselines'

  • Primary Outcome: Clinical reasoning performance comparison between LLM and physicians

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not reported - diagnostic accuracy metrics needed

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Implementation would require significant infrastructure, training, and integration with existing clinical workflows Relevance to Australian practice unclear - would need TGA approval for clinical decision support tools, consideration of medico-legal implications, and integration with existing electronic health records Emergency department physicians and potentially other specialists involved in complex diagnostic reasoning

Abstract

More than 65 years ago, complex clinical diagnostic reasoning cases were introduced as the gold standard for the evaluation of expert medical computing systems, a standard that has held ever since. In this study, we report the results of a physician evaluation of a large language model (LLM) on challenging clinical cases across five experiments with a baseline of hundreds of physicians. We then report a real-world study comparing human expert and artificial intelligence (AI) second opinions in randomly selected patients in the emergency room of a major tertiary academic medical center. In all experiments, the LLM outperformed physician baselines and displayed continued improvement from prior generations of AI clinical decision support. Our study suggests that LLMs have eclipsed most benchmarks of clinical reasoning, motivating the urgent need for prospective trials.

References

  1. 1.Brodeur, P. G., Buckley, T. A., Kanjee, Z., Goh, E., Ling, E. B., Jain, P., Cabral, S., Abdulnour, R. E., Haimovich, A. D., Freed, J. A., Olson, A., Morgan, D. J., Hom, J., Gallo, R., McCoy, L. G., Mombini, H., Lucas, C., Fotoohi, M., Gwiazdon, M., Restifo, D., Restrepo, D., Horvitz, E., Chen, J., Manrai, A. K., & Rodman, A. (2026). Performance of a large language model on the reasoning tasks of a physician. Science, 384(6695). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adz4433
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service