Patients' mHealth Apps Usage and Data Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality Concerns: Exploratory Study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 567 patients using mHealth apps for self-care management in Saudi Arabia |
| I — Intervention | Not applicable (observational study) |
| C — Comparator | Varying levels of data privacy, security, and confidentiality concerns |
| O — Outcomes | Perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and behavioral intention to use mHealth apps |
Bottom Line
This cross-sectional study of 567 Saudi patients reveals that data privacy and security concerns significantly influence mHealth app adoption, with 38% expressing high-level concerns. Younger, more educated women showed greatest privacy concerns. Reduced privacy and security concerns were associated with increased perceived usefulness (β=0.31-0.47), ease of use (β=0.18-0.43), and intention to use mHealth apps (β=0.18-0.36). While the study provides valuable insights into digital health adoption barriers, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and cultural specificity may limit generalisability to Australian healthcare settings. Healthcare providers should consider demographic-specific privacy concerns when implementing mHealth solutions, ensuring robust security measures and transparent data governance to optimise patient adoption and engagement with digital health technologies.
Key Findings
P Value: P-values ranging from 0.001 to 0.03 for significant associations
Effect Size: Beta coefficients ranging from 0.18 to 0.47 for associations between privacy concerns and app adoption factors
Primary Outcome: 38.2% of participants expressed high levels of data privacy, confidentiality, and security concerns
Nnt Or Sensitivity: 18-25% of variance in perceived usefulness, ease of use, and behavioral intention explained by tested factors
Confidence Interval: 35.6%-41.4% for proportion with high privacy concerns
Clinical Application
Findings suggest need for enhanced privacy communication and security features in mHealth apps to improve adoption rates Relevant for Australian digital health initiatives including My Health Record and PBS-subsidised digital therapeutics, though cultural differences may limit direct applicability. TGA regulation of software as medical devices increasingly important Patients using or considering mHealth apps for chronic disease self-management, particularly younger, more educated females who demonstrate higher privacy concerns
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Technology Adoption Model (TAM) offers a potential framework for elucidating the relationships between data privacy or security concerns and behavioral intention, perceived usefulness (PU), and perceived ease of use (PEOU) of mobile health (mHealth) apps, particularly for patients' self-care management. In Saudi Arabia, limited information is available on these pertinent research areas despite the government's relentless efforts to bolster the use of mHealth apps. OBJECTIVE: This study applies the TAM and the psychosociocultural framework to explore the influence of patients' data privacy and security concerns on the PU, PEOU, and behavioral intention to use mHealth apps for self-care management in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted by recruiting patients using mHealth apps for self-care from various provinces in Saudi Arabia. Research instruments were developed based on the components of 2 theories: the psychosociocultural framework and TAM, which were then piloted, validated, and distributed to participants via Google Forms. Linear regression models were performed to test the hypothesized relationships. RESULTS: Overall, 567 patients using mHealth apps participated in the study. Slightly more than one-third (217/567, 38.2%; range 35.6%-41.4%) of the participants expressed a high level of concern regarding data privacy, confidentiality, and security, with significant predictors being female gender, higher educational qualifications, and younger age groups (<46 years). About 18% to 25% of the variance in PU, PEOU, and behavioral intention to use mHealth apps was explained by the tested factors. Patients were more likely to have higher PU following a unit decrease in data confidentiality (β=.31; P=.01) and security concerns (β=.47; P=.01). The PEOU of mHealth apps increased as users demonstrated less concern regarding data privacy (β=.18; P=.001), confidentiality (β=.24; P<.001), and security (β=.43; P=.02). Likewise, behavioral intention to use mHealth apps also increased significantly following a reduction in respondents' concerns toward data privacy (β=.18; P=.02), confidentiality (β=.24; P=.03), and security issues (β=.36; P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Specific demographic factors and concerns regarding data security and privacy influence patients' PU, PEOU, and behavioral intention to use mHealth apps for self-care management. Targeting the age-, education-, and gender-based differences regarding the usage of mHealth apps. Health care providers and policymakers may consider age-, education-, and gender-based differences when developing strategies to improve the adoption of mHealth apps among the Saudi patient population.
References
- 1.Alhammad, N., Alajlani, M., Abd-Alrazaq, A., Arvanitis, T. N., & Epiphaniou, G. (2026). Patients' mHealth apps usage and data privacy, security, and confidentiality concerns: Exploratory study. JMIR Formative Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018560
Related Research
The Journal of rheumatology
Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review
3 Aug 2026
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ChatGPT in urogynecology: Comparing large language model responses to human experts
3 Aug 2026
Sleep medicine
Concordance of wearable device sleep metrics with patient-reported sleep quality: A systematic review
3 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service