Research Appraisalother

Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor Enlicitide Versus Oral Nonstatin Therapies: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal of the American College of CardiologyCatapano, Alberico L, Mikhailova, Elina, Navar, Ann Marie et al.21 July 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

65CEBM
Evidence: Insufficientother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationStatin-treated adults aged ≥18 years with LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL and a previous major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event, or LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL if at intermediate-to-high risk for a first ASCVD event (mean age 64.4 years, 37% female, 98% on moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy)
I — InterventionEnlicitide (MK-0616) 20 mg orally once daily — a novel oral PCSK9 inhibitor (macrocyclic peptide) — for 56 days
C — ComparatorThree active oral comparators: (1) bempedoic acid 180 mg once daily; (2) ezetimibe 10 mg once daily; (3) bempedoic acid 180 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg once daily — all for 56 days
O — OutcomesPrimary: mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56. Secondary: mean percentage changes in apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and non-HDL cholesterol (nonHDL-C). Safety: overall adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs

Key Findings

  • P Value: All pairwise comparisons of enlicitide vs each comparator: P<0.001

  • Effect Size: Enlicitide achieved approximately 28–58 percentage points greater LDL-C reduction compared with active comparators. Reductions in ApoB and nonHDL-C were also significantly greater with enlicitide (all P<0.001). Proportions of AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across all treatment arms.

  • Primary Outcome: Mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56: Enlicitide -64.6% vs bempedoic acid -6.3% vs ezetimibe -27.8% vs bempedoic acid + ezetimibe -36.5%; enlicitide superior to all comparators (all P<0.001)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: NNT for cardiovascular outcomes cannot be calculated from this surrogate-endpoint trial. Based on established Mendelian randomisation and statin trial data, each 1 mmol/L (~38.7 mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C reduces major cardiovascular events by approximately 22% (relative risk reduction). A 64.6% LDL-C reduction on top of background statin therapy would be expected to produce substantial absolute risk reduction in very high-risk patients, but this requires confirmation in a dedicated cardiovascular outcomes trial.

  • Confidence Interval: Enlicitide: 95% CI -68.3% to -60.9%; Bempedoic acid: 95% CI -13.5% to 0.8% (crosses zero); Ezetimibe: 95% CI -32.3% to -23.4%; Combination: 95% CI -40.8% to -32.2%

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many adults fail to achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals on statin monotherapy, requiring additional nonstatin lipid-lowering medication. Enlicitide, an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, lowered LDL-C by 60% compared with placebo; its efficacy compared with other oral nonstatin therapies has yet to be examined. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the efficacy of enlicitide, a novel oral PCSK9 inhibitor, vs other oral nonstatin therapies. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator trial, statin-treated adults aged ≥18 years with LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL and a previous major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event, or LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL if at intermediate to high risk for a first event, were randomized in 2:1:1:2 fashion to 20 mg enlicitide (n = 101), 180 mg bempedoic acid (n = 50), 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 50), or 180 mg bempedoic acid plus 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 100) once daily for 56 days. The primary endpoint was mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56; secondary endpoints included mean percentage changes in apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (nonHDL-C). Safety endpoints included overall adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs. RESULTS: Among 301 randomized participants (mean age 64.4 years, 37% female, 98% receiving moderate- to high-intensity statin), 298 (99.0%) completed the trial. The mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56 was -64.6% (95% CI: -68.3% to -60.9%) with enlicitide, -6.3% (95% CI: -13.5% to 0.8%) with bempedoic acid, -27.8% (95% CI: -32.3% to -23.4%) with ezetimibe, and -36.5% (95% CI: -40.8% to -32.2%) with bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe; enlicitide was superior to each comparator (all P < 0.001). Reductions in ApoB and nonHDL-C were also greater with enlicitide (all P < 0.001). Proportions of participants with AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: In statin-treated adults with a history of a major ASCVD event or at increased risk for a first event, enlicitide achieved greater reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, and nonHDL-C than other oral nonstatin therapies, demonstrating its potential role as an important add-on option when LDL-C goals are not met with the use of statins alone. (A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enlicitide Decanoate [MK-0616, Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor] Compared With Ezetimibe or Bempedoic Acid or Ezetimibe and Bempedoic Acid in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia [MK-0616-018] [CORALreef AddOn; NCT06450366).

Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service