Research Appraisalother

Optimization strategies for monoclonal antibody production: advances in simulation and artificial intelligence in bioprocessing

mAbsKubra, Kadeejathul, Shaik, Munawar A1 Dec 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

50CEBM
Evidence: Moderateother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationMonoclonal antibody (mAb) manufacturing processes — encompassing upstream cell culture (USP), downstream purification (DSP), and integrated plant-level bioprocessing operations
I — InterventionProcess simulation, mathematical optimisation, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) strategies applied across the mAb manufacturing workflow
C — ComparatorConventional mAb manufacturing approaches without advanced simulation or AI/ML integration; traditional batch and fed-batch bioprocessing paradigms
O — OutcomesProductivity gains, critical quality attribute (CQA) maintenance, cost reduction (particularly Protein-A chromatography costs), cycle time, scalability, impurity clearance, manufacturing flexibility, and regulatory compliance

Bottom Line

This narrative review from UAE University synthesises current approaches to optimising monoclonal antibody manufacturing through process simulation, mathematical modelling, and AI/ML applications across upstream cell culture, downstream purification, and plant-level operations. The review is timely given the global expansion of mAb therapeutics and the persistent challenge of high manufacturing costs — particularly Protein-A chromatography — that constrain affordability and access. The authors identify meaningful opportunities in continuous perfusion bioreactors, intensified downstream processing, and AI/ML-driven quality prediction and process control. However, the review's utility is substantially limited by its narrative rather than systematic methodology: no search strategy is reported, no quality appraisal of primary studies is performed, and no quantitative synthesis is attempted. Clinicians and health economists should treat the conclusions as hypothesis-generating rather than evidence-based. For Australian practice, improved mAb manufacturing efficiency has downstream implications for PBS listing viability and biosimilar competition. Senior clinicians should note that regulatory acceptance of AI/ML in bioprocessing remains an active area of development with TGA, FDA, and EMA all developing guidance. This review earns a Moderate rating for its breadth and relevance, tempered by significant methodological limitations inherent to its narrative format.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not applicable to this review format

  • Effect Size: Not quantified; review reports qualitative improvements in productivity, CQA maintenance, and cost reduction from cited primary studies without pooled effect estimates

  • Primary Outcome: Narrative synthesis of optimisation strategies for mAb manufacturing using process simulation and AI/ML across USP, DSP, and plant-level operations

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable; no diagnostic, therapeutic, or prognostic NNT/sensitivity/specificity data reported. Manufacturing cost and cycle time improvements are referenced qualitatively from primary sources but not aggregated

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported — no meta-analytic pooling performed

Clinical Application

Implementation of AI/ML and simulation-based optimisation in mAb manufacturing is feasible at large-scale facilities with existing data infrastructure, but significant barriers remain for smaller manufacturers including data standardisation, validated model development, and regulatory acceptance pathways. The review appropriately notes that benefits are contingent on robust process-specific validation Australia's mAb therapeutic landscape is substantial, with numerous agents listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) across oncology, immunology, and rare diseases. The TGA regulates biologics under the Biologicals framework, and any AI/ML-assisted manufacturing changes would require TGA notification or variation depending on the nature of the process change. The Australian Government's Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) and the emerging domestic biomanufacturing strategy (including the mRNA and biologics manufacturing initiatives post-COVID-19) make this review relevant to Australian bioprocessing policy. RACGP and specialist college guidelines do not directly address manufacturing optimisation, but improved manufacturing efficiency could enhance PBS listing viability for high-cost mAb therapies and support biosimilar market entry, which is a priority for the Australian healthcare system Biopharmaceutical manufacturers, bioprocess engineers, and clinical pharmacologists involved in mAb development and production. Indirectly relevant to clinicians and health economists assessing mAb therapy availability, biosimilar access, and cost-effectiveness in therapeutic decision-making

Abstract

The rapid growth of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies has increased the need for efficient, scalable, and affordable manufacturing processes. However, mAb production remains complex because of nonlinear upstream cell culture behavior, expensive downstream purification, especially Protein-A chromatography, and plant-level bottlenecks that can increase cost, cycle time, and manuacturing uncertainty. This review examines recent developments in mAb manufacturing with focus on process simulation, mathematical optimization, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) across upstream processing (USP), downstream processing (DSP), and integrated plant-level operation. In USP, media optimization, dynamic feeding, high-density cultures, and continuous perfusion bioreactors are discussed in relation to productivity and critical quality attributes (CQAs). In DSP, alternative and intensified purification strategies are reviewed with a focus on recovery, impurity clearance, scalability, cost, and technology maturity. AI/ML applications are also discussed from early-stage development and cell-line screening to upstream control, CQA prediction, chromatography optimization, and downstream decision support. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data heterogeneity, limited standardized datasets, model transferability, and regulatory constraints remain important barriers to implementation. Overall, this review uniquely connects simulation and AI/ML approaches to practical optimization across the full mAb manufacturing workflow, including design, scheduling, debottlenecking, purification, monitoring, and quality prediction. The combination of process simulation, continuous bioprocessing, and AI/ML-based decision support may enable more flexible, reliable, and cost-effective mAb manufacturing. However, these benefits depend on validation through robust models, process-specific case studies, and technoeconomic analysis.

References

  1. 1.Kubra, K., & Shaik, M. A. (2026). Optimization strategies for monoclonal antibody production: advances in simulation and artificial intelligence in bioprocessing. mAbs. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2026.2706886
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service