Once-weekly semaglutide versus placebo in patients with alcohol use disorder and comorbid obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Treatment-seeking adults with moderate to severe alcohol use disorder and comorbid obesity |
| I — Intervention | Once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously plus standard cognitive behavioural therapy |
| C — Comparator | Placebo (saline) subcutaneously plus standard cognitive behavioural therapy |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: reduction in heavy drinking days at 26 weeks. Secondary: multiple alcohol-related and somatic outcomes |
Bottom Line
This well-designed randomised controlled trial demonstrates that once-weekly semaglutide 2.4mg significantly reduces heavy drinking days in treatment-seeking patients with alcohol use disorder and comorbid obesity. The 13.7 percentage point greater reduction compared to placebo represents a clinically meaningful benefit, with manageable gastrointestinal side effects. While promising, this single-centre study requires replication in larger, multicentre trials before routine clinical adoption. The findings support emerging evidence for GLP-1 receptor agonists as novel therapeutic targets for alcohol use disorder, potentially offering a valuable addition to current treatment paradigms combining pharmacotherapy with behavioural interventions. Australian clinicians should await further evidence and regulatory guidance before considering off-label prescribing, though the results warrant serious consideration for future treatment guidelines.
Key Findings
P Value: p=0.0015
Effect Size: Treatment difference -13.7 percentage points favouring semaglutide
Primary Outcome: Reduction in heavy drinking days: semaglutide -41.1 percentage points vs placebo -26.4 percentage points
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Number needed to treat approximately 7 patients to achieve one additional meaningful reduction in heavy drinking days
Confidence Interval: 95% CI -22.0 to -5.4 percentage points
Clinical Application
Requires weekly subcutaneous injection and specialist monitoring. Integration with existing addiction treatment services needed Semaglutide available on PBS for diabetes and obesity. Off-label use for alcohol use disorder would require specialist prescribing and careful patient selection. Aligns with RACGP guidelines emphasising multimodal addiction treatment approaches Treatment-seeking adults with moderate to severe alcohol use disorder and comorbid obesity in specialist addiction or endocrinology services
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder accounts for 5% of deaths worldwide annually, and there is an urgent need for new therapeutic interventions. Preclinical and initial human studies indicate that the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide might reduce alcohol drinking. This study evaluated the efficacy of semaglutide once-weekly in treatment-seeking patients with alcohol use disorder and comorbid obesity. METHODS: In a 26-week, single-centre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, treatment-seeking participants with moderate to severe alcohol use disorder and comorbid obesity were assigned (1:1) to receive once-weekly semaglutide (2·4 mg subcutaneously) or placebo (saline subcutaneously), in addition to standard cognitive behavioural therapy. The primary endpoint was a reduction in the number of heavy drinking days assessed after 26 weeks of intervention, analysed with an ANCOVA model. Analysis adhered to the intention-to-treat principle, and missing outcome data were addressed using multiple imputations. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.govNCT05895643, and is complete. FINDINGS: From June 10, 2023, to Feb 4, 2025, 108 participants (53 women and 55 men) were enrolled, with 54 participants in each of the semaglutide and placebo treatment groups, and all were included in the data analysis. Overall, 88 participants (81%) completed the full intervention. Semaglutide was associated with a reduction in heavy drinking days (-41·1 percentage points from baseline, 95% CI -48·7 to -33·5) compared with placebo (-26·4, -34·1 to -18·6; estimated treatment difference -13·7 percentage points, -22·0 to -5·4; p=0·0015), and had substantial effects on multiple secondary alcohol-related and somatic outcomes. Adverse events were transient, generally mild to moderate gastrointestinal effects, and occurred more frequently in the semaglutide group. INTERPRETATION: Semaglutide showed robust therapeutic effects in treatment-seeking participants with obesity and alcohol use disorder and this trial supports previous preclinical and clinical findings suggesting GLP-1 receptor agonists as a potential novel treatment target for alcohol use disorder. FUNDING: The Research Foundation, Mental Health Services (Capital Region of Denmark), the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Novavi Foundation, the Hartmann Foundation, and the Augustinus Foundation.
References
- 1.Klausen, M. K., Justesen, S. K., Pedersen, J. N., Rasmussen, L., Jensen, A., Jensen, M. E., Knorr, U. B., Bergmann, M. L., Holst, J. J., Hartmann, B., Koob, G. F., Benveniste, H., Volkow, N. D., Ekstrøm, C. T., Knudsen, G. M., Vilsbøll, T., & Fink-Jensen, A. (2026). Once-weekly semaglutide versus placebo in patients with alcohol use disorder and comorbid obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. *Lancet*, *407*(10462), 1234-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00305-3
Related Research
PloS one
Integrating smoking cessation into HIV care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and the evidence gap in cost-effectiveness.
1 Aug 2026
Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention
Natural language processing tool for extracting information about opioid overdoses in the USA from case narratives in the violent death reporting system.
21 July 2026
Medicine
Effect of physical exercise on executive function in individuals with substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
19 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service