Novel Double Expansion Technique (Khalifah's Technique) Versus Ridge Splitting in Immediate Implant Placement in Narrow Ridges: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 40 patients with narrow ridges requiring immediate dental implant placement (57 implants total) |
| I — Intervention | Novel double expansion technique (DET) - Khalifah's technique |
| C — Comparator | Ridge splitting technique (RST) - control group |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: implant stability, marginal bone loss, keratinized mucosa width. Secondary: plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, postoperative pain, analgesic consumption |
Bottom Line
This RCT suggests a novel double expansion technique may offer advantages over traditional ridge splitting for immediate implant placement in narrow ridges, including reduced postoperative pain, improved implant stability, and less marginal bone loss. However, the abstract provides insufficient methodological detail for robust quality assessment. Key limitations include unclear randomisation procedures, lack of statistical precision measures, and absence of quantified effect sizes. While the comprehensive outcome assessment and 12-month follow-up are strengths, clinicians should await full publication with detailed methodology before considering technique adoption. The clinical significance of reported differences remains unclear without statistical analysis. Further validation studies would strengthen the evidence base for this technique.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Not quantified - described qualitatively only
Primary Outcome: Implant stability and marginal bone loss favoured double expansion technique
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Cannot be calculated from available data
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Requires specialised surgical technique and training; limited to experienced implant surgeons Relevant to Australian oral surgery and periodontal practice; technique training would need TGA-approved continuing education; cost-effectiveness unclear for PBS consideration Patients requiring immediate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present and compare the novel double expansion technique (DET) (Khalifah's technique) and the ridge splitting technique (RST) in cases of narrow ridges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients (57 dental implants [DIs]) with narrow ridges were randomly allocated to a control group, which employed the RST, and to a study group, which employed the DET. Secondary stability, marginal bone loss (MBL), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), Plaque Index (PI), bleeding index (BI), and probing depth (PD) were assessed at baseline (time of definitive abutment and temporary crown placement) and then at 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain and the number of analgesic tablets consumed were assessed daily during the first postoperative week. RESULTS: The study group had lower pain levels during the first 2 days postoperatively and presented with greater primary and secondary stability at baseline and at 3 months. Moreover, patients in that group had less MBL at all time points and greater KMW at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Otherwise, both groups showed comparable results regarding PI, BI, and BD. CONCLUSIONS: The study group had superior performance, which may be attributed to the lower degree of trauma with the DET.
References
- 1.Khalifah, M. A. (2026). Novel Double Expansion Technique (Khalifah's Technique) Versus Ridge Splitting in Immediate Implant Placement in Narrow Ridges: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11388
Related Research
International dental journal
Deep Learning Based on Swin-Transformer and 3D U-Net: Implant Three-Dimensional Position Planning
2 Aug 2026
Journal of radiation research
A model-based selection of oral cancer patient for passive scattering proton beam therapy
26 July 2026
Head and neck pathology
A Deep Learning AI Model for Histopathological Diagnosis and Grading of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Salivary Glands
22 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service