Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Patients With Pretreated Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: The GCO-001 NIPINEC Randomized Phase II Trial

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical OncologyWalter, Thomas Pierre, Mazieres, Julien, Otto, Josiane et al.20 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

60CEBM
Evidence: WeakRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationAdults (≥18 years) with advanced large- and small-cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma and large-cell lung neuroendocrine carcinoma, performance status ≤2, receiving second- or third-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure
I — InterventionNivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 2 years
C — ComparatorNivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks alone for up to 2 years
O — OutcomesPrimary: objective response rate at 8 weeks. Secondary: best overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety profile

Bottom Line

This phase II trial of 185 patients with pretreated advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma showed modest activity for nivolumab-ipilimumab combination compared to nivolumab alone, with objective response rates of 14.0% versus 7.2% at 8 weeks. However, the clinical benefit was limited, with median progression-free survival of only 2 months and overall survival of 6 months in both arms. The combination was associated with significant toxicity, including 13% grade 3-4 asthenia and one treatment-related death. While these results suggest some activity of immune checkpoint inhibition in this difficult-to-treat population, the magnitude of benefit is modest and must be weighed against toxicity risks. The authors appropriately conclude that further studies evaluating earlier use or combination with chemotherapy are warranted before this approach can be recommended as standard care.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported for primary endpoint comparison

  • Effect Size: Best ORR: 9.6% vs 20.9%; median PFS ~2 months both arms; median OS ~6 months both arms

  • Primary Outcome: Objective response rate at 8 weeks: 7.2% (nivolumab) vs 14.0% (nivolumab-ipilimumab)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Number needed to treat approximately 15 patients for one additional response with combination therapy

  • Confidence Interval: ORR 95% CI: 2.7-15.1% (nivolumab) vs 7.4-23.1% (combination)

Clinical Application

Both nivolumab and ipilimumab are PBS-listed for other indications; however, cost-effectiveness for NEC would require separate assessment Results applicable to Australian practice; however, limited efficacy may not meet PBS cost-effectiveness thresholds. RACGP guidelines would likely recommend discussion of modest benefits versus toxicity risks Australian patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy and have adequate performance status

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is no standard second-line therapy for gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of nivolumab ± ipilimumab. METHODS: The GCO-001-NIPINEC (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03591731) trial was a noncomparative, open-label, phase II trial. The main inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, performance status (PS) ≤2, advanced large- and small-cell GEP-NEC and large-cell lung NEC, and second- or third-line treatment for NECs refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) and stratified by age and PS to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg/once every 2 weeks) ± ipilimumab (1 mg/kg/once every 6 weeks) for 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at 8 weeks, assessed by investigators. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients (91 in the nivolumab arm and 94 in the nivolumab-ipilimumab arm) were enrolled between December 2018 and March 2021; 169 were analyzed (median age of 64.5 years, 71% male, 91% PS 0-1). The main primary tumor locations were lungs (50%), colorectal (15%), gastroesophageal (14%), and pancreatic (13%) regions. The ORR at 8 weeks was 7.2% (95% CI, 2.7 to 15.1]) in the nivolumab arm and 14.0% (95% CI, 7.4 to 23.1) in the nivolumab-ipilimumab arm. The best ORR was 9.6% and 20.9%, respectively, whereas the median progression-free and overall survival were approximately 2 months and 6 months in both arms. One treatment-related death occurred, in the nivolumab arm. The grade 3-4 adverse events (≥5%) were asthenia (13%), gamma-glutamyl transferase increase (10%), alkaline phosphatase increase (9%), dyspnea (7%), and anemia (6%) in the nivolumab-ipilimumab arm. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab-ipilimumab could be a second-/third-line treatment option for patients with NECs. However, given the limited magnitude of benefit, studies are warranted to evaluate its use earlier and/or associated with chemotherapy.

References

  1. 1.Walter, T. P., Mazieres, J., Otto, J., Lena, H., Lepage, C., Smith, D., Madelaine, J., Gérinière, L., Egenod, T., El Hajbi, F., Ferru, A., Clément-Duchene, C., Madroszyk, A., Brotelle, T., Bouhier-Leporrier, K., Desrame, J., Ghiringhelli, F., Paleiron, N., Khalil, A., Milot, L., Chevallier, O., Couvelard, A., Lantuejoul, S., Langlais, A., Morin, F., Duruisseaux, M., Michel, P., Louvet, C., Westeel, V., & Girard, N. (2026). Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Patients With Pretreated Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: The GCO-001 NIPINEC Randomized Phase II Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-01657
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service