Research Appraisalother

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Current Literature Review

Am SurgAttaar, Numair, Pascarella, Luigi1 Dec 2025DOI

Clinical Snapshot

55CEBM
Evidence: Weakother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS)
I — InterventionDiagnostic strategies and treatment approaches including physical therapy and surgical decompression
C — ComparatorConservative versus surgical management approaches
O — OutcomesClinical presentation, diagnostic accuracy, treatment effectiveness, and patient outcomes

Bottom Line

This narrative review provides a clinical overview of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome management but lacks the methodological rigour of a systematic review. The authors advocate for a stepwise approach beginning with conservative management through physiotherapy, progressing to surgical decompression for refractory cases. The preference for rib-sparing techniques reflects evolving surgical practice aimed at reducing complications. However, the absence of systematic literature search methodology and quality assessment limits the strength of recommendations. Clinicians should interpret these findings as expert opinion rather than high-level evidence. The diagnostic challenge remains significant given symptom overlap with other conditions, emphasising the need for comprehensive clinical assessment and multidisciplinary input. While the clinical approach described appears sound, practitioners should seek additional high-quality evidence when making treatment decisions.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not applicable - narrative review

  • Primary Outcome: Clinical management recommendations for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Diagnostic challenge noted due to symptom overlap with cervical radiculopathy and other neuropathies

  • Confidence Interval: Not provided

Clinical Application

Recommendations appear feasible in Australian healthcare settings with access to physiotherapy and surgical services Relevant to Australian practice; stepwise approach aligns with conservative-first principles. Surgical options available through public and private systems. May require specialist referral pathways consistent with Australian healthcare structure Patients presenting with upper extremity pain, weakness, and paraesthesia suggestive of nTOS

Abstract

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (nTOS), the most prevalent type of thoracic outlet syndrome, results from compression of the compression of the brachial plexus as it traverses the scalene triangle and rectopectoralis minor space. It typically presents with upper extremity pain, hand weakness, paresthesia, and muscle atrophy that is often exacerbated by arm elevation or overhead activity. Etiology commonly includes congenital anatomical variants, trauma, and repetitive overhead activity. Diagnosis remains challenging as a result of significant symptom overlap with cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathies, and entrapment neuropathies. Work up involves a combination of thorough history and physical with electrophysiologic testing, diagnostic injections and imaging such as MRI or duplex ultrasonography. Initial therapy indicates physical therapy with a focus on decompression and postural correction. In patients with persistent symptoms, motor deficits or failed conservative management, surgical decompression using transaxillary, supraclavicular or minimally invasive techniques is indicated. Rib-sparing surgical decompression is increasingly favored given lower complication rates. Postoperative rehabilitation focuses on restoring range of motion and shoulder girdle strength. This review serves to outline clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies and operative options for nTOS while emphasizing an individualized, stepwise approach to optimize outcomes and minimize risk.

References

  1. 1.Attaar, N., & Pascarella, L. (2025). Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Current Literature Review. American Surgeon. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251358432
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service