Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Neural correlates of rumination in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of fMRI evidence

Behavioural brain researchCarneiro, Adriana Munhoz, da Silva, Valquiria Aparecida, Razza, Lais B et al.5 June 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

65CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with psychiatric disorders (primarily major depressive disorder, also including other conditions with rumination)
I — InterventionfMRI neuroimaging assessment of rumination (via trait questionnaires, state-induction paradigms, cognitive tasks, or resting-state fMRI)
C — ComparatorHealthy controls or baseline/pre-intervention states
O — OutcomesNeural correlates and brain network patterns associated with rumination across psychiatric conditions

Bottom Line

This systematic review of 32 fMRI studies reveals consistent neural alterations associated with rumination across psychiatric disorders, particularly involving the default mode network, limbic regions, and prefrontal cortex. While rumination shows transdiagnostic features, disorder-specific neural patterns may exist. The persistence of neural signatures in remitted patients suggests potential trait vulnerability markers. However, significant methodological heterogeneity and the predominance of non-randomized studies limit the strength of conclusions. The evidence is insufficient to support immediate clinical application of neuroimaging for rumination assessment, but provides valuable insights for future research directions. Clinicians should focus on established psychological interventions for rumination while awaiting more robust neuroimaging evidence to guide personalized treatments.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not applicable for systematic review

  • Effect Size: Not quantified - narrative synthesis only

  • Primary Outcome: Neural correlates of rumination across psychiatric disorders

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Neural signatures persisted in remitted patients, suggesting trait vulnerability markers

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Limited immediate clinical application due to research-grade fMRI requirements and methodological heterogeneity Relevant for Australian psychiatrists and psychologists treating mood disorders; may inform future neuroimaging research priorities but not ready for routine clinical use Patients with psychiatric disorders, particularly major depressive disorder, showing ruminative thinking patterns

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rumination is a transdiagnostic, persistent factor across many psychiatric conditions. Mapping its neural mechanisms may help differentiate ruminative profiles. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review fMRI studies that evaluated rumination in psychiatric populations METHODS: We searched four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus) and included studies that integrated rumination measures with fMRI data. RESULTS: Thirty-two articles met criteria; most were non-randomized (n = 31, 97%) and focused on depression (n = 24, 75%). Across disorders, clinical groups showed higher rumination than healthy controls, including in euthymic participants. In major depressive disorder, neural alterations implicated the default mode network, limbic and striatal regions, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex consistent with maladaptive ongoing processing. Neural signatures often persisted in remitted patients, suggesting possible trait markers of vulnerability. Intervention studies (n = 7) support using neuroimaging to track ruminative profiles and to inform more personalized interventions. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the importance of examining rumination, here measured via trait questionnaires, state-induction paradigms, cognitive tasks, or resting-state fMRI, using more consistent conceptual and methodological approaches. Although rumination is transdiagnostic, implicated brain regions and networks may show disorder-specific patterns. Given heterogeneity in the literature, future work should prioritize controlled and interventional studies to clarify neural mechanisms and guide circuit-based, targeted treatments. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: #CRD532512.

References

  1. 1.Carneiro, A. M., da Silva, V. A., Razza, L. B., Vanderhasselt, M. A., Brunoni, A. R., & da Silva, P. H. R. (2026). Neural correlates of rumination in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of fMRI evidence. Behavioural Brain Research, 116181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116181
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service