Multicentre randomised controlled trial of the Norwegian health in work service for patients with common mental disorders or musculoskeletal disorders: the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) Efficacy Study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with low-to-moderate anxiety/depression and/or musculoskeletal disorders on sickness absence in Northern Norway |
| I — Intervention | Rapid Health in Work (HIA) service with multidisciplinary assessment and treatment within 4 weeks |
| C — Comparator | Delayed HIA (10-14 weeks) and active control (monodisciplinary examination at 8-26 weeks) |
| O — Outcomes | Work participation, return to work, health symptoms, healthcare utilisation, long-term welfare dependency |
Bottom Line
This protocol describes a large Norwegian trial testing whether rapid multidisciplinary assessment and treatment through Health in Work clinics improves return-to-work outcomes for patients with common mental disorders or musculoskeletal conditions. The three-arm design compares rapid intervention (4 weeks), delayed intervention (10-14 weeks), and standard care (8-26 weeks). While the study addresses an important clinical and policy question relevant to Australian practice, this protocol paper provides insufficient methodological detail for full critical appraisal. Key concerns include lack of detail on randomisation procedures, absence of blinding, and limited information on statistical analysis plans. The large sample size (2500 participants) and comprehensive outcome measures are strengths. Results, when available, could inform development of integrated return-to-work services, though implementation would require significant healthcare system investment and coordination between health and employment services.
Key Findings
P Value: Not available - protocol paper
Effect Size: Not available - protocol paper
Primary Outcome: Work participation and return to work rates
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not available - protocol paper
Confidence Interval: Not available - protocol paper
Clinical Application
Requires multidisciplinary team including psychologists, physiotherapists, rehabilitation physicians, and employment support workers Highly relevant to Australian context given similar sickness absence challenges; could inform development of integrated return-to-work services within public healthcare system Adults with common mental disorders (anxiety/depression) or musculoskeletal conditions on sickness absence
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In many countries, a high or increasing rate of sickness absence is challenging the sustainability of present sickness absence benefit schemes. Most sickness absence is certified on the grounds of common mental disorders or musculoskeletal disorders, and substantial effort has been invested in developing interventions promoting return to work for these patients. In Norway, the Health in Work ((HelseIArbeid), HIA) clinics were established as outpatients' services within the specialised healthcare system, with the aim of improving health and supporting return to work. The HIA service admits patients with low-to-moderate anxiety/depression and/or musculoskeletal disorders. In this protocol, we describe the naturalistic multicentre randomised controlled trial Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic Efficacy study, which aims to determine the effect of HIA on work participation and health. METHODS AND ANALYSES: The HIA outpatient service is staffed by clinical psychologists, physiotherapists, medical specialists in physical medicine and rehabilitation and employment support supervisors from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Patients admitted to HIA have access to multidisciplinary assessment and treatment. The trial recruits' patients from five HIA outpatient clinics in Northern Norway. Patients are randomised in equal proportions to either (1) rapid HIA (assessment within 4 weeks), (2) delayed HIA (assessment within 10-14 weeks) or (3) active control, which consists of a monodisciplinary examination at HIA close to diagnosis-specific deadline for examination as suggested by guidelines (8-26 weeks). The trial commenced recruitment on 16 January 2023 and will recruit 2500 patients. The aim is to assess the effect of the HIA service, with the hypothesis that the HIA concept is superior to what resembles treatment as usual, in improving employment and preventing long-term welfare dependency. Secondary outcomes include self-reported symptoms of health problems. We also examine the effect the service has on other healthcare utilisation. To date, no research has been conducted to assess the efficacy of the HIA service. If proven efficacious, and if there is an economic case for this investment in tailored healthcare delivery, the policy implication may be implementation of the service at scale. If not, adaptations or investments into other viable paths of treatment may be considered. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (REC North, #122770). Results from the study will be disseminated at national and international scientific conferences, to funders and participating outpatient clinics in seminars and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05310695.
References
- 1.Aars, N. A., Bardal, I., Terjesen, C., Hansen, B. O., Jerven, A., Kaspersen, K. I., Lyngedal, Ø., Hüttepohl, F., Johnsen, I., Uglebakken, T. O., Brinchmann, B., & Mykletun, A. (2026). Multicentre randomised controlled trial of the Norwegian health in work service for patients with common mental disorders or musculoskeletal disorders: the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) Efficacy Study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109083
Related Research
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Machine Learning Frameworks for Wearable-Based Stress Modeling in Naturalistic Settings: Scoping Review
1 Aug 2026
Lasers in medical science
Effect of photobiomodulation on trapezius myofascial pain: a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.
28 July 2026
Journal of neural engineering
Multimodal quantification of cognitive load using a printed wearable facial bio-potential system
23 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service