Micrografts-a novel ally in hard-to-heal wounds: a systematic review.
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults with hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds refractory to conventional treatment approaches |
| I — Intervention | Micrografts (MGs) - transplantation of stem cell suspension to wound sites |
| C — Comparator | Conventional wound treatment approaches or no specific comparator |
| O — Outcomes | Wound healing time, clinical symptom improvement, healing promotion |
Bottom Line
This systematic review examines micrografts as a treatment for chronic wounds but provides limited high-quality evidence. The review included only 15 studies, predominantly case reports and small case series, with no formal quality assessment or quantitative synthesis. While the authors report positive outcomes including reduced healing times and improved symptoms, the evidence base is insufficient to support routine clinical adoption. The lack of standardised protocols, absence of randomised controlled trials, and predominance of low-level evidence limit clinical applicability. Clinicians should await higher-quality studies before considering micrografts as standard therapy. The review highlights an emerging area requiring rigorous research methodology and standardised outcome measures.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable - no statistical pooling performed
Effect Size: Not quantified - qualitative synthesis only
Primary Outcome: Wound healing promotion with reduced healing time and improved clinical symptoms
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculated - insufficient data for quantitative analysis
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Limited by lack of standardised protocols and application methods; requires specialist expertise in stem cell handling and wound management Would require TGA approval for stem cell therapies; potential PBS consideration pending robust evidence; relevant to wound care specialists and plastic surgeons in tertiary centres Adults with chronic, hard-to-heal wounds refractory to conventional treatment, particularly in specialist wound care settings
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Wound healing is complex, and hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds pose significant treatment challenges, especially in adults. Micrografts (MGs) are emerging as a promising treatment for wounds refractory to conventional approaches. MG involves transplanting a stem cell suspension to the wound to promote healing. Scientific studies on MG are increasing; however, a systematic review is needed for a comprehensive understanding of its efficacy. METHOD: A systematic review conducted on 30 March 2024 used PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases to evaluate skin and dermal MGs in wound healing. PRISMA guidelines were followed and predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. All authors reviewed the studies and discussed results to ensure consistency in study screening, selection and data extraction. RESULTS: A total of 1251 papers were examined, with 23 eligible for full-text review. After exclusions based on language, reviews, MG size and tissue focus, 15 articles were included in the final review: seven case reports; five case series; two prospective series (one with 70 patients, the other with 30 patients) and a case-control study. CONCLUSION: The results of the reviewed studies suggest that MGs may promote wound healing, with reported reductions in healing time and improvements in clinical symptoms in hard-to-heal wounds. However, standardisation of treatment protocols and application methods is required. The role of MGs in the treatment of acute wounds remains to be clarified.
References
- 1.Polverino, G., Russo, F., Lombardi, M., Formica, S., & D'Andrea, F. (2024). Micrografts-a novel ally in hard-to-heal wounds: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0145
Related Research
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Governance Framework for Safe and Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Modified Delphi Consensus
13 June 2026
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis
30 May 2026
Scientific reports
Uncertainty estimation and probabilistic skull shape reconstruction using bayesian neural networks
28 May 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service