Research AppraisalSystematic Review

mHealth-Based Gamification Interventions to Promote Health Among Older Adults: Scoping Review

JMIR mHealth and uHealthChen, Xi, Zhu, Yishu, Jiang, Dian et al.4 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

60CEBM
Evidence: WeakSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationOlder adults (aged 65+ years)
I — InterventionmHealth-based gamification interventions (mobile health applications incorporating game elements)
C — ComparatorNot applicable (scoping review mapping existing literature)
O — OutcomesHealth promotion outcomes including enjoyment, motivation, cognitive function, physical activity, digital literacy, mental health, adherence, and social engagement

Bottom Line

This scoping review provides the first systematic mapping of mHealth gamification interventions for older adults, identifying 11 studies showing promise across cognitive, physical, and psychosocial health domains. While interventions demonstrated improvements in motivation, cognitive function, and physical activity, the evidence base remains limited with only recent studies available. The most effective game elements included progress tracking, challenges, and goal-setting, delivered via various platforms from mobile apps to VR systems. However, the small study numbers, lack of theoretical frameworks in most interventions, and absence of long-term follow-up data preclude definitive practice recommendations. Australian clinicians should view these interventions as potentially beneficial adjuncts to traditional care, particularly for tech-savvy older adults, while awaiting more robust evidence. The field shows promise but requires larger, theoretically-grounded studies with standardized outcome measures before widespread clinical implementation.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not applicable (scoping review)

  • Primary Outcome: Mapping of mHealth gamification interventions for older adults across multiple health domains

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: 11 studies identified with diverse game elements: progress, challenges, goals, levels, rewards most common

Clinical Application

Moderate - requires digital literacy support and age-appropriate interface design Relevant to Australian aged care policy and digital health initiatives, aligns with Aged Care Quality Standards promoting wellness and lifestyle approaches Community-dwelling older adults interested in digital health solutions

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthy aging has emerged as a global priority. However, older adults' participation in health promotion programs remains low, and traditional health promotion models have achieved limited success in fostering sustained engagement among this population. Mobile health (mHealth)-based gamification interventions offer a promising way to address these challenges. However, no published reviews support or oppose the use of mHealth-based gamification interventions as health promotion strategies in older adults. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to identify mHealth interventions using gamification to promote health among older adults. METHODS: Our scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley's framework. The process followed PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Literature Search Extension) checklist. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 8 databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycARTICLES, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library, from their inception to December 10, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts via Rayyan, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. RESULTS: This scoping review identified 11 studies. Only 1 article was published before 2022. The interventions were found to improve enjoyment and motivation (n=5), cognitive function (n=3), physical activity (n=2), and digital literacy (n=2). Individual studies also reported improvements in mental health (n=1) and adherence (n=1), a reduction in suicidal ideation (n=1), improvements in physical function (n=1), the promotion of social engagement (n=1), and the identification of mild cognitive impairment (n=1). Game elements used were ranked by frequency as progress, challenges, goals, levels, reward, sensation, storytelling or narration, leaderboard, surprise, and avatar. No research was found to use the game element of "social sharing." mHealth types included augmented and virtual reality-based training systems, wearable devices, mobile phones, tablets, and Windows platforms and devices. Notably, only 4 studies applied theoretical frameworks, and 3 omitted the concrete approach to gamification. CONCLUSIONS: As the first scoping review to identify and map mHealth-based gamification interventions for older adults, this study highlights their potential as an innovative approach to health promotion. By systematically synthesizing evidence regarding intervention designs, gamification strategies, and preliminary health outcomes, it establishes a foundation for future inquiry. However, this review is limited by the small number of included studies, precluding broad generalizations. Future research should assess long-term impacts, integrate theoretical frameworks, establish reporting guidelines, design personalized social-interactive interventions, and expand to broader health domains. Ultimately, these insights provide targeted guidance for developing age-appropriate digital health solutions, contributing to the realization of active aging.

References

  1. 1.Chen, X., Zhu, Y., Jiang, D., Huang, J., Xie, Q., Chen, Y., Chang, J., Huang, W., Ning, H., & Feng, H. (2026). mHealth-Based Gamification Interventions to Promote Health Among Older Adults: Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. https://doi.org/10.2196/82368
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service