MDD-thinker: A reasoning-enhanced large language model for diagnosis of major depressive disorder.

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: Not reported

• Effect Size: Accuracy 0.8268, F1-score 0.8081

• Primary Outcome: Diagnostic accuracy for major depressive disorder

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Sensitivity and specificity not reported

• Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Limited by requirement for large language model infrastructure and unclear integration with existing clinical workflows Would require validation against Australian diagnostic standards and integration with existing mental health assessment tools used in RACGP guidelines Patients with suspected major depressive disorder in research settings

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of global disability and poses a substantial public health burden. However, current diagnostic approaches largely rely on subjective assessments and lack the ability to integrate heterogeneous clinical and sociodemographic information. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to support MDD diagnosis through reasoning over complex data, yet their clinical applicability is constrained by challenges related to interpretability, hallucinations, and reliance on synthetic data. METHODS: We propose MDD-Thinker, an LLM-based diagnostic system that integrates supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance reasoning and interpretability under the evaluated conditions. Using the UK Biobank dataset, we constructed 40,000 structured reasoning samples and incorporated an additional 10,000 records from publicly available mental health datasets. MDD-Thinker was trained on these heterogeneous textual data and evaluated against conventional machine learning models, deep learning methods, and representative LLM baselines in terms of diagnostic performance and interpretability. RESULTS: MDD-Thinker achieved high performance in MDD diagnosis, with an accuracy of 0.8268 and an F1-score of 0.8081, showing better performance than conventional machine learning models, deep learning approaches, and representative LLM baselines on the evaluated dataset. Beyond predictive accuracy, it consistently produced structured reasoning paths that were clinically coherent, enabling transparent interpretation of diagnostic decisions in the evaluated experiments. The integration of SFT and RL contributed to notable improvements in both diagnostic reliability and reasoning quality. CONCLUSION: MDD-Thinker demonstrates the potential of reasoning-enhanced LLMs for large-scale MDD diagnosis under the evaluated settings. By jointly optimizing accuracy, interpretability, and efficiency, the proposed system provides a scalable and explainable approach for intelligent psychiatric assessment within the scope of the study, highlighting the potential of reasoning-oriented LLMs in mental health care.