Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Management of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review of retrospective studies

Neurosurgical reviewde Oliveira Manduca Palmiero, Helbert, Gadelha Figueiredo, Eberval28 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

50CEBM
Evidence: WeakSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationChildren with brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs)
I — InterventionVarious treatment modalities including microsurgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), endovascular embolization, multimodality therapy
C — ComparatorConservative/observation management and between different treatment modalities
O — OutcomesObliteration rates, hemorrhage (first presentation and post-treatment), functional outcomes, complications, recurrence after apparent cure

Bottom Line

This systematic review of 20 retrospective studies involving nearly 2,000 pediatric patients with brain arteriovenous malformations reveals significant variability in treatment outcomes and methodological approaches. Microsurgical resection achieved the highest obliteration rates (81-100%) but in selected populations, while stereotactic radiosurgery showed more modest success (51-68.5% in largest series) with latency-period hemorrhage risks. Importantly, recurrence after apparent angiographic cure occurred in up to 29% of patients in some cohorts, emphasizing the need for long-term surveillance. The review highlights critical limitations in current evidence: inconsistent outcome definitions, heterogeneous patient selection, and lack of standardized reporting. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously, recognizing that treatment selection bias significantly influences reported outcomes. The evidence supports individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making rather than protocol-driven approaches, with explicit long-term follow-up regardless of treatment modality.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not applicable - no statistical testing performed

  • Effect Size: Microsurgery: 81-100% obliteration (mean ~93%); SRS: 51-68.5% in largest series

  • Primary Outcome: Obliteration rates varied significantly by treatment modality

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Recurrence after apparent cure: <1% to 29% across cohorts; SRS latency-period hemorrhage: 1.1-3.2%

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported - descriptive synthesis only

Clinical Application

Treatment selection heavily dependent on lesion characteristics (Spetzler-Martin grade) and institutional expertise Relevant to Australian pediatric neurosurgical centers; treatment decisions should involve multidisciplinary teams given complexity and long-term surveillance requirements Children with brain arteriovenous malformations requiring treatment decisions

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are a major cause of hemorrhagic stroke in children, yet management decisions rely largely on heterogeneous cohorts. Contemporary retrospective studies were systematically reviewed to summarize outcomes across treatment modalities and to characterize interstudy variability. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE was searched over the past decade for retrospective pediatric intracranial bAVM cohorts. Eligible studies reported management with observation/conservative care, endovascular embolization, microsurgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or multimodality therapy. Screened studies had data extracted using a standardized form. Outcomes included obliteration, hemorrhage (first presentation and post-treatment), functional outcomes, complications, and recurrence after apparent cure. Treatment categories were harmonized into mutually exclusive groups for descriptive synthesis. RESULTS: Of 113 identified records, 20 retrospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Hemorrhage was the most common presentation. Across cohorts reporting Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade, low-grade lesions (SM I-II) comprised 740 patients (44.1%), SM III 645 (38.4%), and SM IV-V 293 (17.5%). Treatment strategies varied substantially; among 1,973 classifiable patients, cohorts reported microsurgery-only, SRS-only, endovascular-only, multimodality, and conservative approaches. Definitions of obliteration and assessment methods were inconsistent (DSA-confirmed vs. MRI-based). Microsurgical series reported obliteration rates of 81%-100% in selected populations (unweighted mean ~ 93% across reporting cohorts), whereas SRS-only cohorts demonstrated obliteration rates of 51%-68.5% in the three largest unselected pediatric series (range 36%-84% across all SRS-inclusive cohorts), with latency-period hemorrhage rates of approximately 1.1%-3.2% per series. Recurrence after apparent cure was reported in 7 cohorts, with rates ranging from < 1% to 29%, occurring years after angiographic obliteration. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary retrospective pediatric bAVM data indicate that modality-specific outcomes are strongly influenced by lesion selection, outcome definitions, and follow-up duration. Recurrence after apparent cure is not uncommon and supports explicit long-term surveillance. Standardized definitions and harmonized reporting are needed to improve interpretability and comparative inference.

References

  1. 1.de Oliveira Manduca Palmiero, H., & Gadelha Figueiredo, E. (2026). Management of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review of retrospective studies. Neurosurgical Review. https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24211
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service