Management of osteoporosis in older men: a systematic review of randomized trials of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Older men with primary or secondary osteoporosis |
| I — Intervention | Pharmacological interventions (bisphosphonates, teriparatide) and non-pharmacological interventions (resistance exercise, L-carnitine supplementation) |
| C — Comparator | Placebo, control groups, or standard care |
| O — Outcomes | Fracture risk reduction, bone mineral density (BMD) improvement at lumbar spine and femoral neck |
Bottom Line
This systematic review of 12 RCTs provides modest evidence that pharmacological therapies (bisphosphonates, teriparatide) improve bone mineral density in older men with osteoporosis, but fails to demonstrate consistent fracture risk reduction - the most clinically relevant outcome. The evidence base remains limited, with only 12 studies identified despite comprehensive searching. Non-pharmacological interventions like resistance exercise show promise but are supported by minimal evidence. The inconsistent fracture prevention results are concerning given that fracture reduction, not BMD improvement, should drive treatment decisions. While the review addresses an important clinical gap - osteoporosis management in older men is indeed underdiagnosed and undertreated - the evidence is insufficient to substantially change current practice. Clinicians should continue following established guidelines while awaiting larger, adequately powered trials focused on fracture prevention. The review highlights the urgent need for more robust research in this vulnerable population, particularly studies with sufficient power to detect clinically meaningful fracture risk reduction.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported in abstract
Effect Size: Modest improvements in BMD for bisphosphonates and teriparatide
Primary Outcome: Fracture risk reduction - inconsistent effects across studies
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data - insufficient fracture risk reduction evidence
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
Pharmacological interventions readily available; resistance exercise programs require structured implementation and patient compliance Bisphosphonates and teriparatide available on PBS for osteoporosis. RACGP guidelines support bone health assessment in older men. TGA-approved medications align with study interventions Older men (≥60 years) with confirmed osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5) in primary care and specialist settings
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis in older men is often underdiagnosed and undertreated, increasing the risk of fractures and functional decline. Despite its clinical relevance, evidence specific to this population remains limited. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in reducing fracture risk and improving bone mineral density (BMD) in older men with primary or secondary osteoporosis. METHODS: Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SciELO, PEDro, and LILACS, in addition to gray literature sources. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions were included. Analyses were performed using RStudio (v. 4.3.3), and risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Results Twelve RCTs were included (10 pharmacological, one nutritional, and one exercise-based). The mean age was 60.9 ± 5.2 years, with baseline T-scores of - 2.9 ± 0.3 at the lumbar spine and - 2.7 ± 0.4 at the femoral neck. Bisphosphonates and teriparatide showed modest improvements in BMD, while effects on fracture risk were inconsistent. Resistance exercise (60-90 min/day) and L-carnitine supplementation were associated with BMD benefits, although evidence was limited by methodological constraints. Risk of bias varied across studies. CONCLUSION: Pharmacological therapies improve BMD in older men; however, evidence remains insufficient to demonstrate consistent fracture risk reduction. Non-pharmacological interventions show potential benefits but are supported by limited evidence. Larger randomized trials with clinically relevant outcomes are needed.
References
- 1.da Rocha-Loures, M. A., de Freitas Zerbini, C. A., de Azevedo, E., Martinez, L. C., de Resende Guimaraes, M. F. B., Franco, A. S., Paupitz, J. A., Bezerra, M. C., Szejnfeld, V. L., Pereira Soares, M. R. M., Grizzo, F. M. F., da Silva, A. R. B., da Silva Reis, D. M., da Silva, D. S., & Waclawovsky, G. (2026). Management of osteoporosis in older men: a systematic review of randomized trials of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. Archives of Osteoporosis. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-3045
Related Research
The Journal of rheumatology
Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review
3 Aug 2026
Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America
Demystifying Artificial Intelligence: Key Concepts with Examples in Rheumatology
2 Aug 2026
Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America
Machine Learning-Enhanced Autoantibody Discovery and Diagnostics in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service