Research Appraisalobservational

Machine learning identifies pupil size and corneal thickness as key predictors of axial elongation rate

PloS oneZhou, Peng, Chen, Sitong, Li, Yingli et al.DOI

Clinical Snapshot

55CEBM
Evidence: Moderateobservational

PICO Framework

P — PopulationMyopic patients from Shanghai Parkway Health Ophthalmology Department (training) and Peking University People's Hospital Optometry Center (validation)
I — InterventionMachine learning prediction model using ocular biometric parameters (central corneal thickness, axial length, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth, corneal diameter, pupil size)
C — ComparatorSeven different machine learning algorithms compared (XGBoost, random forest, support vector machine, others)
O — OutcomesAxial elongation rate prediction accuracy (R², MSE), variable importance scores for myopia progression

Bottom Line

This study developed a machine learning model using routine ocular biometric measurements to predict myopia progression, identifying pupil size and corneal thickness as key predictors. While the XGBoost algorithm showed strong performance (R² = 0.766), the cross-sectional design limits causal inference about progression. The model requires validation in diverse populations before clinical adoption. Australian clinicians should note that current evidence supports established risk factors (age, parental myopia, near work) over these novel biometric predictors. The study represents promising proof-of-concept work but needs longitudinal validation and broader demographic testing before routine clinical use. Standard myopia management protocols remain the evidence-based approach until further validation studies confirm clinical utility.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: P > 0.05 for baseline characteristics comparison

  • Effect Size: XGBoost model R² = 0.766 on validation set

  • Primary Outcome: Axial elongation rate prediction accuracy

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Pupil size importance score 100, corneal thickness 40.88, age of onset 17.96

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Requires standard ocular biometry equipment available in most Australian optometry and ophthalmology practices Could complement existing RACGP myopia management guidelines, though validation in Australian population needed before clinical implementation Myopic patients requiring progression risk assessment, particularly in specialist ophthalmology and optometry settings

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model for myopia progression using ocular biometric parameters to provide an objective assessment tool for clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated at Shanghai Parkway Health Ophthalmology Department as the training set, and myopic individuals from the Optometry Center of Peking University People's Hospital as the validation set. Demographic and biometric data were collected, including central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), corneal curvature (K-value), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal diameter (WTW), and pupil size (PS). Seven machine learning models (e.g., XGBoost, random forest, support vector machine) were employed for modeling, with performance optimized via 5-fold cross-validation. Model accuracy was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and the coefficient of determination (R²), and variable importance was analyzed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the training and validation sets (all P > 0.05). The XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance, achieving R² = 0.913 (MSE = 0.005) on the training set and R² = 0.766 (MSE = 0.016) on the test set. Variable importance analysis revealed pupil size (score 100) and corneal thickness (40.88) as the key predictors of axial elongation rate, followed by age of onset (17.96). CONCLUSION: The machine learning-based prediction model effectively utilizes ocular biometric data to assess myopia progression risk, with pupil size and corneal thickness identified as core predictive factors. This model provides a quantitative tool for early clinical intervention. Future studies should expand the sample size and incorporate additional biomarkers to optimize performance.

References

  1. 1.Zhou, P., Chen, S., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2026). Machine learning identifies pupil size and corneal thickness as key predictors of axial elongation rate. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348085
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service