Irinotecan with trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab for second-line metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II multicenter study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to prior fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy |
| I — Intervention | Combination therapy with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), irinotecan, and bevacizumab |
| C — Comparator | None (single-arm study) |
| O — Outcomes | Objective response rate (primary), disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety profile |
Bottom Line
This phase II trial demonstrates that combining irinotecan with TAS-102 and bevacizumab achieves an 18.3% response rate and 6.6-month median PFS in second-line mCRC. While these efficacy signals are encouraging, the universal occurrence of nausea and high rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia (48.3%) raise significant tolerability concerns. The single-arm design limits comparative assessment against established second-line options like FOLFIRI-bevacizumab. Patients with prior primary tumor resection showed superior outcomes, suggesting potential for biomarker-driven selection. Before clinical adoption, randomized controlled trials comparing this regimen to standard second-line therapies are essential to establish its true therapeutic benefit-risk profile in the mCRC treatment landscape.
Key Findings
P Value: Subgroup analysis p-values: primary resection OS p=0.048, PFS p=0.004
Effect Size: Disease control rate: 83.3%
Primary Outcome: Objective response rate: 18.3% (11/60 patients)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Median PFS 6.6 months, median OS 17.3 months
Confidence Interval: PFS: 95% CI 4.39-8.81 months; OS: 95% CI 13.55-21.05 months
Clinical Application
Requires careful patient selection and monitoring due to high toxicity profile, particularly neutropenia management TAS-102 and bevacizumab are PBS-listed for mCRC. Combination would require special access scheme consideration. Aligns with COSA guidelines for second-line mCRC management Australian patients with mCRC who have failed first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin-based therapy
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) face a constrained therapeutic landscape following the failure of initial treatment. This multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial (NCT06202001) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel second-line regimen comprising trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Patients with mCRC resistant to prior fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Based on a preceding phase I trial, patients received biweekly cycles of oral TAS-102 (30 mg/m² twice daily, days 1-5), intravenous irinotecan (150 mg/m²), and intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg). The primary outcome measure was the objective response rate (ORR). From October 2023 to August 2024, 60 patients were enrolled. As of December 2024, the ORR was 18.3% (2 complete and 9 partial responses), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 83.3%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.39-8.81), and the median overall survival (OS) was 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.55-21.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that prior resection of the primary tumor was associated with significantly longer median OS (21.9 vs. 16.2 months; p = 0.048) and PFS (8.9 vs. 5.2 months; p = 0.004). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (100%), neutropenia (86.7%), and anemia (83.3%). The predominant grade 3/4 TRAEs included neutropenia (48.3%), febrile neutropenia (8.3%), and diarrhea (6.7%). In conclusion, the combination of irinotecan, TAS-102, and bevacizumab shows encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile as a second-line therapy for mCRC, meriting further investigation.
References
- 1.Yang, W., Zhang, J., Liang, P., Qian, Z., Wang, D., Zhang, W., Li, B., Cui, C., Zhong, X., Wu, G., & Sun, Y. (2026). Irinotecan with trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab for second-line metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II multicenter study. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70181-9
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service