Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Intentional partial odontectomy and effect on inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a systematic review

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)Brudner, Benjamin, Jacobs, Tyler, Ziccardi, Vincent B2 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

65CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients requiring mandibular third molar surgery with radiographic proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve
I — InterventionCoronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy)
C — ComparatorComplete extraction of mandibular third molars
O — OutcomesNeurosensory complications (inferior alveolar nerve injury), postoperative complications, root migration

Bottom Line

This systematic review suggests coronectomy offers a safer alternative to complete extraction for mandibular third molars in close proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve, significantly reducing neurosensory complications. While root migration is common post-coronectomy, it rarely causes clinical problems. The evidence supports considering coronectomy in high-risk cases, but careful patient selection and long-term follow-up are essential. However, the abstract lacks crucial methodological details and quantitative results needed for full critical appraisal. Clinicians should await the full paper for comprehensive evidence evaluation before changing practice protocols.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported in abstract

  • Effect Size: Significantly reduced with coronectomy (specific measures not provided in abstract)

  • Primary Outcome: Inferior alveolar nerve injury risk

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract

Clinical Application

Requires surgical expertise in coronectomy technique and appropriate case selection Relevant to Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons; technique may require specific training and should align with ANZAOMS guidelines for third molar surgery Patients requiring mandibular third molar surgery with radiographic evidence of IAN proximity

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize current evidence comparing coronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy) and complete extraction of mandibular third molars in close radiographic proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve, focusing on neurosensory complications and other clinically relevant postoperative outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were manually searched using strings combining terms such as 'coronectomy,' 'partial odontectomy,' 'root retention,' 'mandibular third molar,' 'extraction,' and 'inferior alveolar nerve injury.' Searches were conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. CONCLUSION: Coronectomy significantly reduces the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury in mandibular third molar surgery compared to extraction in cases with inferior alveolar nerve proximity. The main drawback to this technique is subsequent root migration, which is common but rarely clinically problematic. Careful patient selection and follow-up are essential in selecting this procedure.

References

  1. 1.Brudner, B., Jacobs, T., & Ziccardi, V. B. (2026). Intentional partial odontectomy and effect on inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a systematic review. Quintessence International, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6912877
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service