Research Appraisalqualitative

Integrating Gait Analysis and AI Into Knee Osteoarthritis Care: Protocol for a 3-Phase Participatory Qualitative Study

JMIR research protocolsLindsay, Owen Ryan, Astephen Wilson, Janie L13 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

75CEBM
Evidence: Moderatequalitative

PICO Framework

P — PopulationClinicians involved in knee osteoarthritis management in Nova Scotia orthopedic settings
I — Intervention3-phase participatory design process using in-depth interviews to develop a clinical decision support tool integrating gait analysis and AI
C — ComparatorCurrent knee OA management workflows without digital decision support tools
O — OutcomesBarriers and facilitators to implementation, user requirements, workflow processes, and user acceptance of prototyped solutions

Bottom Line

This protocol describes a well-structured 3-phase participatory study to develop a clinical decision support tool integrating gait analysis and AI for knee osteoarthritis management. The approach appropriately uses qualitative methods to understand implementation barriers and user requirements. However, as a protocol paper, it lacks sufficient methodological detail regarding sampling, analysis frameworks, and researcher reflexivity considerations. The research addresses an important clinical need - improving surgical decision-making in knee OA through objective biomechanical data. While initially focused on Nova Scotia, the participatory framework could inform broader digital health implementation efforts. Clinicians should await the completed study findings, expected by January 2027, to assess the practical utility of the proposed decision support tool.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not applicable - protocol study

  • Primary Outcome: Protocol paper - no results yet available

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable - qualitative protocol

Clinical Application

Moderate - requires institutional support and clinician engagement, dependent on technology infrastructure Framework potentially applicable to Australian orthopedic services, though would need adaptation for different healthcare system structures and TGA regulatory requirements for AI-based clinical tools Orthopedic clinicians managing knee osteoarthritis patients, particularly in Canadian healthcare settings

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) leads to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. For advanced stages, knee arthroplasty surgery is the standard treatment, yet dissatisfaction and persistent mobility deficits remain common. Current surgical decision-making processes seldom incorporate objective predictors of outcomes, such as biomechanical data. Advances in computer vision, wearable sensors, and artificial intelligence now enable efficient capture and interpretation of clinically prognostic gait features in real-world settings. However, the clinical adoption of such innovations remains limited, hindered by usability challenges, misalignment with stakeholder needs, and system-level barriers. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to inform the development of a knee OA clinical decision support (CDS) tool that integrates gait analysis and artificial intelligence with clinical decision-making. More broadly, it seeks to advance a framework for participatory digital health CDS tool implementation by identifying and addressing suboptimal workflows, stakeholder priorities, and organizational challenges. METHODS: This study uses a 3-phase participatory design process, with in-depth interviews conducted in each phase to generate insights that inform subsequent stages. Phase 1 investigates perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of a digital CDS tool and examines current workflow processes in knee OA management. Phase 2 focuses on identifying and defining user requirements to guide solution ideation for translational digital decision support. Phase 3 assesses user acceptance of prototyped solutions. Field observations in phase 1 and usability testing in phase 3 will supplement interview findings with real-world evidence. RESULTS: The study was funded in November 2024. Ethics approval was granted by the Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board on July 28, 2025. Data collection began in September 2025. As of February 2026, a total of 6 clinicians have been interviewed, with all 6 interviews transcribed and 4 coded as part of phase 1 analysis. Study completion is anticipated by August 2026. Findings will be published by January 2027. CONCLUSIONS: Our stakeholder-driven approach prioritizes both technological rigor and practical usability, addressing key human factors for successful implementation. While initially focused on Nova Scotia's orthopedic setting, this research provides a scalable framework for integrating digital decision support tools into broader clinical environments, advancing innovation in knee OA care and beyond.

Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service