Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Influences of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) and cognitive reappraisal on emotions and aggression following social exclusion

Behavioural brain researchDing, Yu, He, Chenjia, Li, Hanjun et al.27 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

50CEBM
Evidence: WeakRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — Population32 university students experiencing social exclusion
I — InterventionHigh-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) and/or cognitive reappraisal training
C — ComparatorSham HD-tDCS and/or no cognitive reappraisal (2×2 factorial design)
O — OutcomesAggressive behaviour (Competitive Reaction Time Task, Job-relevant Evaluations Task) and negative emotions following social exclusion

Bottom Line

This small pilot RCT (n=32) investigated HD-tDCS and cognitive reappraisal for managing aggression after social exclusion in university students. While the study found HD-tDCS reduced aggressive behaviour and cognitive reappraisal decreased negative emotions, the clinical significance remains unclear. Major limitations include very small sample size (8 per group), unclear blinding procedures, and lack of safety or long-term outcome data. The study population (university students) limits generalisability to clinical populations. While the interventions show promise, larger, well-designed trials with clinically relevant populations and longer follow-up are needed before considering clinical implementation. The dissociation between emotional and behavioural regulation pathways is theoretically interesting but requires replication in adequately powered studies.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Described as 'significant' but specific values not provided

  • Effect Size: Not reported in abstract

  • Primary Outcome: Aggressive behaviour measured by Competitive Reaction Time Task and Job-relevant Evaluations Task

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Cannot be calculated from available data

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

HD-tDCS requires specialised equipment and training; cognitive reappraisal more readily implementable HD-tDCS not currently PBS-listed; would require TGA approval for therapeutic use. Cognitive interventions align with existing psychological therapy frameworks Limited to young adults in research settings; clinical applicability unclear

Abstract

Social exclusion can trigger negative emotions and aggressive behavior, while emotion regulation strategies and neuromodulation techniques may mitigate these effects. This study employed a 2 × 2 factorial design to investigate the impacts of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) and cognitive reappraisal on emotions and aggression following social exclusion. Thirty-two university students were randomly assigned to four groups: active HD-tDCS + cognitive reappraisal, sham HD-tDCS + cognitive reappraisal, active HD-tDCS + no reappraisal, and sham HD-tDCS + no reappraisal. Results showed that active HD-tDCS significantly reduced aggressive behavior in both the Competitive Reaction Time Task and Job-relevant Evaluations Task, likely by enhancing prefrontal regulatory control. Cognitive reappraisal significantly decreased negative emotions but did not directly reduce aggressive behavior, suggesting a dissociation between emotional and behavioral regulation pathways. No significant interaction was found between HD-tDCS and cognitive reappraisal, possibly due to their independent neural mechanisms. These findings highlight the potential of HD-tDCS and cognitive reappraisal as interventions for social exclusion-induced aggression and emotional dysregulation.

References

  1. 1.Ding, Y., He, C., Li, H., & Zhang, J. (2026). Influences of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) and cognitive reappraisal on emotions and aggression following social exclusion. Behavioural Brain Research, 116083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116083
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service