Inflammatory cytokine alterations in genetic and clinical high risk groups of psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) and genetic high-risk (GHR) for psychosis, compared with healthy controls |
| I — Intervention | Clinical high-risk status or genetic high-risk status for psychosis |
| C — Comparator | Healthy controls and between-group comparisons (CHR vs GHR) |
| O — Outcomes | Circulating cytokine levels (plasma/serum), particularly IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-13 |
Bottom Line
This network meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence that inflammatory cytokine profiles differ between clinical high-risk (CHR) and genetic high-risk (GHR) individuals for psychosis. CHR individuals showed elevated IL-6 compared to GHR, while GHR individuals had reduced IL-6 and IL-1β compared to healthy controls. Among CHR patients, those who converted to psychosis had higher IL-13 levels. However, the evidence network was sparse with all CHR-GHR comparisons relying on indirect evidence through healthy controls. The authors appropriately emphasize cautious interpretation given these methodological limitations. While these findings suggest distinct immune profiles in different high-risk populations, the evidence is insufficient to support routine cytokine testing in clinical practice. Larger, standardized multi-center studies with direct comparisons are needed before these biomarkers could inform clinical decision-making in early psychosis services.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported in abstract
Effect Size: Higher IL-6 in CHR vs GHR; Lower IL-6 and IL-1β in GHR vs HC; Higher IL-13 in CHR converters vs non-converters
Primary Outcome: Circulating cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-1β, IL-13) across CHR, GHR, and healthy control groups
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Standardized mean differences used for effect size estimation
Confidence Interval: 95% confidence intervals reported but specific values not provided in abstract
Clinical Application
Limited by availability of specialized CHR assessment tools and genetic risk profiling in routine practice Relevant to EPPIC and headspace early psychosis programs; cytokine testing not currently part of standard CHR assessment protocols under Medicare Individuals identified as clinical or genetic high-risk for psychosis in specialized early intervention services
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammation has been implicated in psychosis, but its role in individuals at clinical (CHR) and genetic (GHR) high-risk remains unclear. We therefore conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare circulating cytokine levels across CHR, GHR, and healthy control (HC) groups. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases up to February 2025, extracting cytokine levels (plasma/serum) from CHR, GHR, and HC groups. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Given that no direct head-to-head comparisons between CHR and GHR were available, indirect comparisons were performed through the common comparator (HC). The transitivity assumption was assessed by comparing key study and participant characteristics across comparisons. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included (CHR: 1601, GHR: 675, HC: 1980). NMA estimates indicated higher IL-6 levels in CHR compared with GHR, while IL-6 and IL-1β levels were lower in GHR compared with HC. In pairwise subgroup analyses, CHR converters showed higher IL-13 levels than non-converters. The evidence network was sparse and star-shaped, with all CHR-GHR estimates relying exclusively on indirect comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first NMA to synthesize cytokine alterations in individuals at high risk for psychosis using indirect evidence. Elevated IL-6 in CHR individuals suggests immune activation, whereas reduced IL-6 in GHR may reflect a distinct immune profile. Increased IL-13 levels in converters highlight potential involvement of Th2-related pathways during transition to psychosis. However, the sparse nature of the evidence network necessitates cautious interpretation of the findings, and larger, standardized multi-center studies are required for confirmation.
References
- 1.Huang, H., Sun, Y., Yin, J., An, S., Liu, M., Gong, Q., Chen, Y., & Deng, H. (2026). Inflammatory cytokine alterations in genetic and clinical high risk groups of psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291726103559
Related Research
Journal of psychiatric research
Systematic review of machine learning and deep learning models for EEG-based detection of depression.
2 Aug 2026
Sleep medicine reviews
Artificial intelligence in sleep medicine I: Diagnosis, treatment, care, and research
2 Aug 2026
International journal of yoga therapy
Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Yoga on Anxiety Severity, Quality of Life, and Biomarkers in Individuals with Anxiety Disorder
31 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service