Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Impact of prophylactic oral azithromycin during labor on Azithromycin Resistance (AMR) in nasal Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in women and infants in the multi-country Azithromycin Prevention in Labor Use Study (A-PLUS)

PloS oneHibberd, Patricia L, Kim, Jean H, Trotta, Marissa et al.DOI

Clinical Snapshot

80CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationWomen in labor and their liveborn infants from 8 sites in 7 countries (n=911 women, 915 infants)
I — InterventionProphylactic oral azithromycin during labor
C — ComparatorPlacebo
O — OutcomesAzithromycin resistance in nasal Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae at multiple time points (labor/day 1, day 7, 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months post-delivery)

Bottom Line

This well-designed sub-study of the A-PLUS trial demonstrates that prophylactic oral azithromycin during labor increases azithromycin resistance in nasal S. aureus among mothers and infants, but these effects are transient. Resistance was significantly elevated at day 7, 6 weeks, and 3 months in mothers, and at 6 weeks in infants, but returned to baseline levels by 6-12 months. While the parent A-PLUS trial showed maternal mortality benefits, clinicians must weigh these against temporary antimicrobial resistance development. The transient nature of resistance changes is reassuring, but supports judicious use of intrapartum azithromycin prophylaxis. Australian obstetricians should consider these antimicrobial resistance implications when implementing azithromycin prophylaxis protocols, particularly in settings with existing high resistance rates. The study's multi-country design enhances generalisability, though local resistance patterns should inform individual practice decisions.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: P < 0.001 (day 7, 6 weeks), P = 0.009 (3 months) for maternal S. aureus; P < 0.001 (6 weeks) for infant S. aureus

  • Effect Size: Statistically significant increases in resistance prevalence and decreases in susceptibility

  • Primary Outcome: Azithromycin resistance in nasal S. aureus significantly higher in azithromycin group vs placebo at day 7, 6 weeks, and 3 months

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Resistance effects transient, resolving by 6-12 months in mothers and after 6 weeks in infants

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Findings inform antibiotic stewardship decisions for intrapartum azithromycin use in routine obstetric practice Relevant to Australian obstetric units considering azithromycin prophylaxis; aligns with RACGP antibiotic stewardship principles and TGA antimicrobial resistance monitoring Women receiving intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and their infants in obstetric settings

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic oral azithromycin vs. placebo reduced maternal, but not neonatal, mortality/sepsis in the A-PLUS Randomized Trial. While prophylactic intrapartum azithromycin reduces maternal mortality/sepsis, it may promote antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in commensal bacteria,. METHODS: Randomly selected women and their infants participating in A-PLUS were enrolled in a longitudinal cross-sectional sub-study to assess the presence of azithromycin resistance in selected bacteria in nasal cultures. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae were cultured on selective agar, then azithromycin-containing agar to select for azithromycin resistant bacteria, identified biochemically. Azithromycin susceptibility was assessed by E-test. Nasal cultures were collected from women and infants between August 11, 2021 and September 18, 2023 during labor/day 1, day 7, 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months after delivery. RESULTS: The study enrolled 911 women and 915 liveborn infants at 8 sites in 7 countries. Azithromycin resistance in S aureus was higher and azithromycin susceptibility was lower in women receiving azithromycin compared with those receiving placebo on day 7 (P < 0.001), 6 weeks (P < 0.001) and 3 months (P = 0.009) after delivery. Azithromycin resistance in S aureus was also higher and azithromycin susceptibility was lower 6 weeks after delivery (P < 0.001) in infants born to women receiving azithromycin, Azithromycin resistance in S. pneumoniae was too sparse to interpret. CONCLUSIONS: There was an increase in prevalence of azithromycin resistance (or reduction in azithromycin susceptibility) in commensal nasal S. aureus between day 7, 6 weeks and 3 months in women exposed to azithromycin vs. placebo and only at 6 weeks in infants exposed to azithromycin vs. placebo. These differences between the azithromycin and placebo groups were no longer detected at 6 and 12 months post-partum in the women and after 6 weeks through 12 months in the infants.

References

  1. 1.Hibberd, P. L., Kim, J. H., Trotta, M., Leal, S. M., Aceituno, A., Ward, D. V., Patel, A., Subramaniam, A., Carlo, W. A., Ahmed, I., Saleem, S., Billah, S. M., Haque, R., Mazariegos, M., Esamai, F., Somannavar, M. S., Goudar, S. S., Chomba, E., Mwenchanya, M., Lokangaka, A., Tshefu, A., Goldenberg, R. L., Bauserman, M., Krebs, N. F., Bucher, S., Derman, R. J., Petri, W. A., Koso-Thomas, M., Babineau, D. C., McClure, E. M., & Tita, A. T. N. (2026). Impact of prophylactic oral azithromycin during labor on Azithromycin Resistance (AMR) in nasal Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in women and infants in the multi-country Azithromycin Prevention in Labor Use Study (A-PLUS). PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346174
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service