Immunonutrition in surgical patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adult surgical patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective or emergency colorectal resection |
| I — Intervention | Immunonutrient supplementation — combined formulas (arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, nucleotides, L-alanine, L-glutamine) or isolated single-nutrient supplementation — administered perioperatively (preoperative, postoperative, or both) |
| C — Comparator | Standard nutrition, placebo, or no supplementation |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: postoperative complications (including wound infections, anastomotic leaks, infectious complications); Secondary: length of hospital stay, nutritional status, physical status, immune response markers |
Bottom Line
This narrative systematic review examines immunonutrient supplementation in colorectal cancer surgical patients across 22 studies (20 RCTs, 2 observational) published from 2000 to 2025. The central finding — that combined immunonutrition (arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, nucleotides, L-alanine, L-glutamine) may reduce postoperative wound infections, while isolated omega-3 supplementation confers no benefit — is clinically plausible and consistent with prior meta-analyses in this field. However, the review's methodological limitations are substantial. No meta-analysis was performed, meaning no pooled effect sizes or confidence intervals are available. Formal heterogeneity assessment, risk of bias appraisal, and GRADE certainty grading are absent from the reported data. The inclusion of observational studies alongside RCTs without stratification, and the absence of confirmed grey literature searching or prospective registration, further limit confidence in the conclusions. For Australian clinicians, combined perioperative immunonutrition in elective colorectal cancer surgery is already supported by ESPEN guidelines and ERAS protocols. This review does not materially advance the evidence base beyond existing higher-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It may serve as a useful narrative overview for trainees but should not independently inform practice change. Senior clinicians should continue to apply existing guideline recommendations pending more rigorous quantitative synthesis.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported at review level
Effect Size: Not quantified — narrative synthesis only; directional finding of reduced wound infections with combined immunonutrition (arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, nucleotides, L-alanine, L-glutamine); no benefit identified with isolated supplementation
Primary Outcome: Postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgical patients receiving immunonutrient supplementation
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data — no pooled event rates or risk ratios provided; NNT cannot be derived from this narrative synthesis
Confidence Interval: Not reported — no meta-analysis performed
Clinical Application
Combined immunonutrition formulas (e.g., IMPACT, Oral Impact) are commercially available and can be administered preoperatively (5–7 days), postoperatively, or perioperatively. Feasibility is generally high in elective surgical settings with adequate dietetic support. Cost and patient adherence to preoperative oral supplementation remain practical considerations. In Australia, perioperative immunonutrition for colorectal cancer surgery aligns with ESPEN 2021 guidelines on clinical nutrition in surgery, which are referenced by Australian surgical and dietetic practice. The Dietitians Australia and RACGP support nutritional optimisation in surgical oncology patients. Immunonutrition formulas such as IMPACT are available in Australia but are not currently listed on the PBS, meaning cost is borne by patients or institutions. The TGA does not regulate these products as therapeutic goods in the same category as pharmaceuticals. Australian Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for colorectal surgery increasingly incorporate preoperative nutritional optimisation, and this review's findings are broadly consistent with that framework, though the lack of quantified effect sizes limits direct guideline translation. Clinicians should refer to the ERAS Society and ESPEN guidelines for specific dosing and timing recommendations pending higher-certainty Australian-specific evidence. Adult patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgical resection, particularly those at nutritional risk. Applicability to emergency surgery, advanced/metastatic disease, or patients receiving concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy requires further evidence.
Abstract
Introduction: surgery in patients with colorectal cancer often leads to complications, affecting recovery, prolonging hospital stay, and impacting quality of life. Immunonutrition plays an important role by modulating the immune system and may contribute to the reduction of these complications. Objective: to assess the effect of immunonutrient supplementation on complications in surgical patients with colorectal cancer. Materials and methods: a literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane, following the PRISMA model. A total of 20 clinical trials and two observational studies published between 2000 and 2025 were selected, analyzing postoperative complications, physical or nutritional status, immune response, and length of hospital stay. Results: a reduction in postoperative complications was observed with combined immunonutrient supplementation (arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, nucleotides, L-alanine, and L-glutamine), particularly in wound infections. No benefits were found with isolated supplementation. Conclusion: combined immunonutrient administration may improve postoperative complications, especially wound infections, although results regarding hospital stay are inconsistent. Isolated supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids shows no benefit. Introducción: la cirugía en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal conlleva complicaciones, alterando la recuperación, alargando la estancia hospitalaria y afectando a la calidad de vida. La inmunonutrición ejerce una acción importante al modular el sistema inmunológico y podría mejorar estas complicaciones. Objetivo: evaluar el efecto de la suplementación con inmunonutrientes en las complicaciones en pacientes quirúrgicos por cáncer colorrectal. Material y métodos: se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en PubMed, Web of Science, Embase y Cochrane, siguiendo el modelo PRISMA. Se seleccionaron 20 ensayos clínicos y dos observaciones, publicados entre 2000 y 2025, que analizaron complicaciones posoperatorias, el estado físico o nutricional, la respuesta inmune y la duración de estancia hospitalaria. Resultados: se halló una reducción de las complicaciones posoperatorias con una suplementación combinada de inmunonutrientes como arginina, ácidos grasos omega-3, nucleótidos, L-alanina y L-glutamina, especialmente en infecciones de herida, sin beneficios en la administración aislada. Conclusión: la administración combinada podría mejorar las complicaciones posquirúrgicas, especialmente de la infección de la herida, con resultados contradictorios para estancia hospitalaria. La suplementación aislada de ácidos grasos n-3 no aporta beneficios.
References
- 1.Rodríguez-Criado, C., Gavilán-Díaz, R., & Cabañas Alite, L. (2026). Immunonutrition in surgical patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Nutricion Hospitalaria. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.06378
Related Research
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Biomedical physics & engineering express
BMSNet: a boundary-guided multi-scale polyp segmentation network
28 July 2026
Journal of robotic surgery
Transfer of technical skills from virtual reality robotic simulation to non-virtual surgical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
21 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service