Identifying Skill and Usability Barriers to Digital Health Tool Use Among Older Adult Patients in US Safety Net Clinics: Mixed Methods Study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | English-, Spanish-, or Cantonese-speaking patients aged ≥50 years receiving care at an urban safety net health system in the United States |
| I — Intervention | Observation and video recording of participants navigating four digital health care tasks |
| C — Comparator | Not applicable (descriptive study) |
| O — Outcomes | Identification of fundamental skills required for digital tool use, usability barriers, and factors associated with task completion independence |
Bottom Line
This mixed methods study of 64 older adults in US safety net clinics identified significant barriers to digital health tool use, with only 52-74% completing basic tasks independently. Older age, minoritised ethnicity, non-English preference, lower education, and limited internet access were associated with requiring assistance. The research systematically categorised 13 fundamental skills (typing, navigation, human-computer interaction) and 9 usability barriers necessary for digital tool success. Key implications include the need for co-design with diverse end users, distinguishing skill gaps from usability issues, and implementing targeted interventions. For Australian practice, these findings highlight the importance of inclusive digital health design for multicultural and older populations, particularly relevant for telehealth expansion and patient portal implementation in community health services.
Key Findings
P Value: P<.001 for most demographic associations with task completion
Effect Size: Not applicable for qualitative study
Primary Outcome: Task completion rates: 74% (video visit), 52% (website navigation), 71% (portal login), 70% (portal signup)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Identified 13 fundamental skill categories (3 typing, 4 navigation, 6 human-computer interaction) and 9 usability barrier categories
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Findings can inform digital health tool design and implementation strategies, though requires organisational commitment to inclusive design Highly relevant to Australian safety net services and multicultural communities. Findings could inform TGA digital therapeutics guidance and support RACGP digital health initiatives for vulnerable populations Older adults (≥50 years) in safety net healthcare settings, particularly those from minoritised communities with limited digital literacy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite their benefits, digital health tools often face adoption barriers because of the digital divide. Identifying the fundamental user skills required to effectively navigate these tools and the usability barriers is essential to addressing disparities in use. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the skill and usability barriers to using digital health tools. METHODS: This study included English-, Spanish-, or Cantonese-speaking patients, aged ≥50 years, who received care at an urban safety net health system in the United States. Participants completed a survey examining sociodemographic characteristics and digital health tool use and were observed and video recorded as they navigated four digital health care tasks: (1) launch a video visit, (2) visit a health website through a URL, (3) log in to the patient portal, and (4) sign up for a patient portal account. Participants who could not independently perform the tasks received additional support. Tasks were conducted in English, while instructions and additional assistance were provided in each participant's preferred language. Video recordings were thematically coded to identify the fundamental skills needed for effective digital tool use and usability barriers in the design of digital tools. We examined whether task independence was associated with participant demographics and thematic categories using Kruskal-Wallis, χ2, and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: In total, 74% (34/46), 52% (31/60), 71% (44/62), and 70% (43/61) of participants (N=64) independently completed digital tasks 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Older age, minoritized races and ethnicities, non-English language preference, lower educational attainment, access to cellular data only or no internet access, and lack of a portal account were associated with a higher likelihood of requiring assistance or being unsuccessful at completing each task (P<.001, except for older age [P=.004]). The qualitative coding of video recordings identified 3, 4, and 6 categories of typing, navigation, and human-computer interaction (HCI) skills, respectively, as fundamental skills required to independently complete digital tasks. χ2 and Fisher exact tests indicated significant associations between most typing, navigation, and HCI categories and independent task completion. We coded usability barriers as one of 6 learnability challenges or 3 operability challenges. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that independent use of digital health tools requires fundamental typing, navigation, or HCI skills as well as high usability of digital tools. The inclusion of 4 different digital tasks added specificity to the type of skills and usability considerations necessary to ensure accessibility of digital health tools to diverse older adults. This study underscores the need for vendors to cocreate digital health tools with historically excluded end users in mind. As health care systems expand digital tool adoption, they must distinguish fundamental skill gaps from usability barriers, as each may require different intervention strategies.
References
- 1.Rapson, T., Ramirez, M., He, S., Wong, J., Kim, H. C., Luna, I., Yang, A., Li, J., Fishman, P. A., Ralston, J. D., Lyles, C. R., & Khoong, E. C. (2026). Identifying skill and usability barriers to digital health tool use among older adult patients in US safety net clinics: Mixed methods study. JMIR Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.2196/78430
Related Research
The Journal of rheumatology
Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review
3 Aug 2026
Journal of medical Internet research
Advancing Human-Centered AI in Clinical Decision Support: Sociocognitive Human-in-the-Loop Study in HIV Care
2 Aug 2026
Journal of psychiatric research
Systematic review of machine learning and deep learning models for EEG-based detection of depression.
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service