High-frequency vs. low-frequency MIDI-assisted group music therapy in psychiatric inpatients: A randomized controlled trial

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: p = 0.023 for stress subscale; p = 0.339 for anxiety; p = 0.270 for depression

• Effect Size: Not reported - only mean scores provided (6.49 ± 5.55 vs 7.03 ± 5.81)

• Primary Outcome: DASS-21 stress subscale showed statistically significant between-group difference favoring high-frequency intervention

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from provided data - no dichotomous outcomes or response rates reported

• Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Requires trained music therapists and MIDI equipment. High-frequency intervention may be resource-intensive for limited clinical benefit Music therapy not routinely covered by Medicare. Would require private funding or hospital resources. Limited evidence base may not support PBS consideration Adult psychiatric inpatients with depression, anxiety, or stress symptoms during brief hospitalizations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Music therapy has been increasingly incorporated into psychiatric inpatient care as an adjunctive intervention; however, evidence regarding its comparative effectiveness, particularly with respect to intervention intensity during brief psychiatric hospitalizations, remains limited. Most randomized trials have evaluated interventions delivered over several weeks, leaving uncertainty about the potential differential effects of higher versus lower intervention intensity within short inpatient stays. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial with a parallel-group design was conducted in an adult psychiatric inpatient unit in Bogotá, Colombia. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a high-frequency music therapy group, which received five sessions delivered on consecutive days within a single inpatient week, or a low-frequency group, which received one session during the same period. Allocation concealment was ensured through computer-generated randomization performed by an independent researcher not involved in participant recruitment or outcome assessment. Primary outcomes were symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress, assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) at baseline and at the end of the intervention week. Secondary outcomes included emotional responses to music therapy, assessed using selected items from the Questionnaire of the Impact of Music Therapy Sessions in Adults (CISMA instrument), and global life satisfaction, measured with the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Between-group changes over time were analyzed using repeated-measures mixed-effects linear models. RESULTS: A total of 91 participants were randomized, of whom 74 (37 per group) completed post-intervention assessments and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Between-group analyses revealed a statistically significant group × time interaction for the DASS-21 stress subscale only. Participants in the high-frequency music therapy group showed a greater reduction in stress scores compared with the low-frequency group, with a statistical between-group difference (6.49 ± 5.55 vs. 7.03 ± 5.81; p = 0.023). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for the DASS-21 anxiety subscale (p = 0.339) or the depression subscale (p = 0.270). Global life satisfaction, as measured by the SWLS, did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). For secondary outcomes assessed using selected CISMA items related to emotional change, between-group differences were small and not statistically significant across all items. Overall, except for stress symptoms, outcomes did not differ significantly between the high-frequency and low-frequency intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, a higher frequency of music therapy sessions was associated with a greater reduction in stress symptoms compared with a lower-frequency intervention during a brief psychiatric hospitalization. However, no between-group differences were observed for anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, or emotional response measures. Overall, these findings indicate limited evidence of differential effectiveness by intervention intensity and should be interpreted cautiously in light of the study's methodological limitations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN87861817 (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN87861817).

References

1. 1.Esteban-Cárdenas, M., Gómez-Puentes, A., Torres-Delgado, C., Hidalgo-Valbuena, A., & Ferro, E. (2026). High-frequency vs. low-frequency MIDI-assisted group music therapy in psychiatric inpatients: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317950