Health-related quality of life domains relevant to people in Europe undergoing cancer treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults receiving cancer treatment in European countries |
| I — Intervention | Qualitative research methodology examining health-related quality of life |
| C — Comparator | Not applicable (qualitative synthesis) |
| O — Outcomes | Quality of life domains, themes, experiences, needs, preferences, and concerns |
Bottom Line
This systematic review synthesizes qualitative evidence from 36 European studies involving cancer patients undergoing treatment, identifying five key quality of life domains. The emergence of 'Clinical Management' as a prominent theme (26 themes) alongside traditional domains suggests patients increasingly value care coordination and communication. While psychological function remains predominant (41 themes), the findings support integrating clinical management aspects into routine quality of life assessments. The study's methodological limitations include a narrow search strategy and geographic bias, but the thematic synthesis provides valuable insights for developing patient-centered care protocols and quality of life instruments in oncology practice.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable for qualitative synthesis
Effect Size: 110 themes synthesized from 36 studies
Primary Outcome: Five quality of life categories identified: Psychological Function (41 themes), Clinical Management (26 themes), Symptoms and Physical Function (18 themes), Social Function (16 themes), Life Disruption (9 themes)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Theme saturation not formally assessed
Confidence Interval: Not applicable for qualitative synthesis
Clinical Application
Findings can inform quality of life assessment tools and patient-centered care protocols Relevant for Australian oncology practice; clinical management themes align with patient-centered care initiatives supported by Cancer Australia and state cancer services Cancer patients undergoing active treatment, particularly relevant for European healthcare contexts
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify and synthesize evidence from European qualitative studies on cancer-related quality of life outcomes, needs, experiences, preferences, and concerns of people undergoing cancer treatment in the last decade. METHODS: Systematic review ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO , CRD42024575065) of European studies using qualitative methodology, assessing constructs related to HRQoL, and involving adults receiving cancer treatment. The search was performed in PubMed and Scopus from January 2013 to July 2024. Titles, abstracts, and full texts screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two researchers. The main outcomes were the themes reported in each study. The thematic analysis was performed by organizing the themes of the studies into categories. RESULTS: Out of 18,256 articles initially identified, 36 met the inclusion criteria: 21 with generic and 15 with specific objectives. Five categories encompassing 110 themes were identified from the generic studies: Psychological Function (n = 41), Clinical Management (n = 26), Symptoms and Physical Function (n = 18), Social Function (n = 16), and Life Disruption (n = 9). Eleven studies with specific objectives focused on clinical management with all their themes fitting within the categories identified in the generic studies. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed the predominance of psychological function and clinical management themes. Symptoms and physical function, social function, and life disruption maintained their importance within the classical HRQoL framework. The emergence of clinical management is consistent with the growing patient-centered care approach, suggesting the need to integrate this content into the evaluation of patients undergoing cancer treatment. LIMITATIONS: most European countries were not represented, and publication bias could hide traditional domains.
References
- 1.Lizano-Barrantes, C., Amat-Fernandez, C., Garin, O., Pardo, Y., Périz-Colón, Ó., Saint-Jean, P. N., Rojas-Concha, L., Thong, M., Apolone, G., Brunelli, C., Caraceni, A., Couespel, N., Bos, N., Groenvold, M., Kaasa, S., Ciliberto, G., Lombardo, C., Pietrobon, R., Pravettoni, G., Sirven, A., Vachon, H., Gilbert, A., Velikova, G., & Ferrer, M. (2026). Health-related quality of life domains relevant to people in Europe undergoing cancer treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. Quality of Life Research, 62(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.62.3.337
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service