Research Appraisalother

Geriatric Telemanagement of Health Conditions (GET HEALTH) in Nursing Home Residents Recently Discharged From the Hospital: Protocol for a Before-After Study

JMIR research protocolsDell'Aquila, Giuseppina, Di Rosa, Mirko, Aguzzi, Irene et al.27 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

65CEBM
Evidence: Weakother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationNursing home residents aged ≥70 years recently discharged from hospital
I — InterventionGeriatric telemanagement (GTM) with geriatrician televisits and GP collaboration
C — ComparatorStandard care (pre-intervention period 2017-2019)
O — OutcomesPrimary: 6-month hospital readmission rate; Secondary: cost-effectiveness

Bottom Line

This protocol describes a before-after study evaluating geriatric telemanagement for nursing home residents recently discharged from hospital. While addressing an important clinical problem - high readmission rates in this vulnerable population - the study design has significant limitations. The before-after methodology comparing historical controls (2017-2019) with prospective intervention participants (2024-2025) is susceptible to temporal confounding, particularly given intervening COVID-19 impacts on healthcare utilisation patterns. The intervention appears feasible and addresses genuine workforce shortages in geriatric care within nursing homes. However, the lack of concurrent controls and potential for secular trends in readmission practices limit the strength of causal inference. Results, when available, should be interpreted cautiously given these methodological constraints. The study may provide preliminary evidence for telehealth models in aged care but would require replication with stronger study designs.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not yet available - protocol stage

  • Effect Size: Not yet available - protocol stage

  • Primary Outcome: 6-month hospital readmission rate

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not yet available - protocol stage

  • Confidence Interval: Not yet available - protocol stage

Clinical Application

Moderate - requires telehealth infrastructure and geriatrician availability Relevant to Australian aged care reform, Medicare telehealth items, and geriatrician workforce shortages in residential care Australian nursing home residents aged ≥70 years with recent hospitalisation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nursing home (NH) residents have a high burden of multimorbidity and disability and are frequently hospitalized. Comprehensive geriatric assessment might reduce hospitalization. However, few geriatricians are working in NHs. Technology might be used to overcome this problem. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to verify if a geriatric telemanagement model improves patient outcomes in NH residents recently discharged from the hospital. METHODS: Clinical outcomes of NH residents recently discharged from the hospital are compared before and after the implementation of GTM, where a geriatrician evaluates each patient during televisits with NH staff and discusses the case with the general practitioner. NH residents aged ≥70 years readmitted to NHs after hospitalization in the 3 years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (2017-2019) represent the control group enrolled in the retrospective preintervention phase. The primary outcome of the study is the hospital readmission rate during 6-month follow-up. Health technology assessment evaluates the cost-effectiveness of model implementation. RESULTS: A total of 333 NH residents were included in the preintervention retrospective study. Data collection started in February 2022 and was completed in February 2023. A total of 104 NH residents were recruited in the intervention study, from March 2024 to March 2025. Data analysis is currently in progress. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, NHs in Italy are striving to manage the complexity of older patients who are often hospitalized. A geriatric telemanagement model might reduce hospitalizations, and therefore negative outcomes, as well as health care costs in this vulnerable population.

Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service