Foundation models for radiology: fundamentals, applications, opportunities, challenges, risks, and prospects.
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Radiology practitioners and healthcare systems implementing AI technologies |
| I — Intervention | Foundation models (large-scale pre-trained AI models) in radiology applications |
| C — Comparator | Traditional narrow AI approaches and conventional radiology practice |
| O — Outcomes | Clinical applications, diagnostic accuracy, workflow integration, ethical considerations, and implementation challenges |
Bottom Line
This international collaborative review provides a comprehensive overview of foundation models in radiology, highlighting their potential for enhanced diagnostic capabilities through multimodal integration and improved generalizability. While these large-scale AI models offer promising applications in image interpretation, report generation, and precision medicine, significant challenges remain. Key concerns include model opacity, validation requirements, regulatory uncertainty, and ethical considerations around bias and data privacy. The review emphasizes the need for rigorous validation studies to address stochasticity and hallucination risks before clinical implementation. For Australian radiologists, this technology represents a future direction requiring careful consideration of TGA regulatory pathways and professional guideline updates. The authors appropriately advocate for responsible adoption, though specific implementation recommendations are limited. This review serves as a valuable primer for understanding foundation models but should be supplemented with systematic reviews and validation studies as the field matures.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable for narrative review
Effect Size: Not quantified - qualitative assessment only
Primary Outcome: Foundation models offer enhanced adaptability, multimodal integration, and improved generalizability compared to traditional narrow AI in radiology
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not reported - review focuses on conceptual framework rather than diagnostic performance metrics
Confidence Interval: Not applicable for narrative review
Clinical Application
Implementation challenges significant, requiring substantial infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and validation studies Relevant to Australian radiology practice, though TGA regulatory pathways for AI medical devices still evolving. RANZCR and ACRRM guidelines would need updating to incorporate foundation model considerations Radiology departments considering AI implementation, particularly in academic and large healthcare systems
Abstract
Foundation models (FMs) represent a significant evolution in artificial intelligence (AI), impacting diverse fields. Within radiology, this evolution offers greater adaptability, multimodal integration, and improved generalizability compared with traditional narrow AI. Utilizing large-scale pre-training and efficient fine-tuning, FMs can support diverse applications, including image interpretation, report generation, integrative diagnostics combining imaging with clinical/laboratory data, and synthetic data creation, holding significant promise for advancements in precision medicine. However, clinical translation of FMs faces several substantial challenges. Key concerns include the inherent opacity of model decision-making processes, environmental and social sustainability issues, risks to data privacy, complex ethical considerations, such as bias and fairness, and navigating the uncertainty of regulatory frameworks. Moreover, rigorous validation is essential to address inherent stochasticity and the risk of hallucination. This international collaborative effort provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals, applications, opportunities, challenges, and prospects of FMs, aiming to guide their responsible and effective adoption in radiology and healthcare.
References
- 1.Akinci D'Antonoli, T., Bluethgen, C., Cuocolo, R., Klontzas, M. E., Ponsiglione, A., & Kocak, B. (2026). Foundation models for radiology: fundamentals, applications, opportunities, challenges, risks, and prospects. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Article 253445. https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253445
Related Research
Journal of medical Internet research
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
8 July 2026
Korean journal of radiology
Agentic Artificial Intelligence for the Automated Generation of Accurate Summary Podcasts of Radiology Research Papers
3 July 2026
Medicine
Artificial intelligence-guided clavicle fracture detection on plain radiographs: A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.
28 June 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service