FGF2 in Burn Wound Healing: From Molecular Function to Clinical Application-A Systematic Review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with burn injuries (thermal injuries), including animal models and in vitro studies |
| I — Intervention | Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) therapy in various formulations (topical, hydrogels, liposomes, gene-activated matrices) |
| C — Comparator | Standard burn care, placebo, or control treatments |
| O — Outcomes | Wound healing time, scar quality, re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, keratinocyte migration, safety outcomes |
Bottom Line
This systematic review of 33 studies suggests FGF2 shows promise in burn wound healing through multiple mechanisms including enhanced angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and re-epithelialization. Topical FGF2 formulations appear to reduce healing time and improve scar quality in partial-thickness burns, with favorable safety profiles reported. However, the evidence base lacks formal meta-analysis and pooled effect estimates. The authors appropriately conclude that broader clinical adoption requires harmonized regulatory evaluation, optimized delivery systems, and multicenter validation studies. While mechanistically compelling, the current evidence is insufficient to recommend routine clinical use without further high-quality randomized controlled trials. Australian clinicians should await TGA-approved formulations and definitive efficacy data before considering implementation in burn care protocols.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: Not quantified in pooled analysis
Primary Outcome: Accelerated burn wound healing with shortened healing time and improved scar quality
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Efficacy dependent on dosage and wound characteristics
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Requires optimized delivery systems and standardized protocols Would require TGA approval for therapeutic use; potential PBS listing considerations for specialized burn units; alignment with ANZBA guidelines needed Patients with partial-thickness burns, diabetic patients with complex burns
Abstract
Burn injuries trigger complex inflammatory and metabolic cascades that impair wound healing and increase morbidity. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), a potent mediator of cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling, has emerged as a promising therapeutic agent in burn care. This systematic review evaluated the biological mechanisms, delivery strategies, and clinical outcomes associated with FGF2 in burn wound healing to clarify its therapeutic value and translational potential. Following PRISMA 2020 standards, a structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar to identify studies investigating FGF2 in thermal injuries. Eligible records included clinical trials, in vivo models, and in vitro experiments. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, the SYRCLE tool, and the Oxford Levels of Evidence. Thirty-three studies (1992-2025) met inclusion criteria, encompassing randomized controlled trials, animal models, and mechanistic analyses. Fibroblast growth factor 2 accelerated repair by stimulating fibroblast proliferation, keratinocyte migration, angiogenesis, and matrix organization. Topical FGF2 formulations shortened healing time and improved scar quality in partial-thickness burns. Innovative carriers, including hydrogels, liposomes, and gene-activated matrices, enhanced bioavailability and sustained local effects. In diabetic and complex burn models, FGF2 mitigated inflammation, preserved barrier integrity, and promoted re-epithelialization. Efficacy depended on dosage and wound characteristics. Studies reported favorable safety profiles with minimal and mild adverse events. Fibroblast growth factor 2 demonstrates regenerative and immunomodulatory potential in burn management. Broader adoption requires harmonized regulatory evaluation, optimized delivery systems, and multicenter validation to define its role in precision-guided burn care.
References
- 1.Niederegger, T., Schaschinger, T., Brandt, J., Munzinger, R., Karakas, E., Knoedler, L., Knoedler, S., Palackic, A., Panayi, A., & Hundeshagen, G. (2026). FGF2 in burn wound healing: From molecular function to clinical application-A systematic review. Journal of Burn Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag020
Related Research
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Governance Framework for Safe and Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Modified Delphi Consensus
13 June 2026
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis
30 May 2026
Scientific reports
Uncertainty estimation and probabilistic skull shape reconstruction using bayesian neural networks
28 May 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service