Extreme weather effects on health services and communities in low and lower-middle income countries: a thematic systematic review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Communities and health systems in low-income countries (LICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) affected by extreme weather events |
| I — Intervention | Exposure to extreme weather events (flooding, high winds, drought, heatwaves, cyclones, and related meteorological phenomena) |
| C — Comparator | No formal comparator; descriptive/thematic synthesis comparing vulnerability, disruption, and resilience across WHO health system building blocks |
| O — Outcomes | Harms to communities and health service delivery; responses and outcomes mapped to the six WHO healthcare system building blocks (service delivery, health workforce, health information systems, medical products/vaccines/technologies, health financing, leadership/governance); themes of vulnerability, disruption, and resilience |
Bottom Line
This thematic systematic review of 183 reports provides the most comprehensive synthesis to date of extreme weather event impacts on health systems and communities in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Using the WHO six health system building blocks as an analytical framework, the review consistently finds that flooding and high winds cause profound disruption across all health system domains, with displacement and community disruption as the dominant population-level consequences. Critically, documented examples of resilience and recovery are far outnumbered by accounts of vulnerability and disruption — a finding that likely reflects both genuine fragility and publication bias toward crisis reporting. The thematic synthesis methodology is appropriate for this heterogeneous evidence base, though the absence of formal risk of bias assessment and GRADE certainty ratings limits the precision of policy recommendations. For clinicians and health system planners working in or with LMIC settings, this review provides a structured evidence base for prioritising climate adaptation investments across workforce, supply chains, financing, and governance domains. The findings are timely given accelerating climate change projections for tropical and subtropical LMICs. Senior clinicians engaged in global health, disaster medicine, or international development should treat this as a foundational reference for climate-resilient health system design.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable (qualitative synthesis)
Effect Size: Not applicable (thematic synthesis); predominant themes identified were displacement and disruption at community level, and vulnerability, disruption, and resilience at health service level
Primary Outcome: Thematic synthesis of harms, responses, and outcomes across the six WHO health system building blocks in LIC/LMIC settings exposed to extreme weather events
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable; key finding is that documented examples of resilience and recovery were substantially fewer than descriptions of vulnerability and disruption across all six WHO healthcare system building blocks in 183 included reports
Confidence Interval: Not applicable (qualitative synthesis)
Clinical Application
Findings are directly applicable to health system strengthening planning, climate adaptation strategies, and emergency preparedness frameworks. The WHO building blocks structure facilitates translation into actionable domain-specific interventions. Implementation feasibility varies significantly by country income level, existing infrastructure, and governance capacity. Australia has direct relevance to this evidence base through its foreign aid and development health programs (DFAT/Australian Aid) in Pacific Island nations and Southeast Asian LMICs, many of which face extreme cyclone, flooding, and drought exposure. The findings support Australian investment in climate-resilient health system strengthening in partner countries. Within Australia, Torres Strait Islander and remote Aboriginal communities share some structural vulnerabilities to extreme weather events documented in this review, though Australia is classified as a high-income country. RACGP and ACRRM guidelines on disaster preparedness for remote and rural practice are relevant. The TGA and PBS frameworks are not directly applicable to LMIC settings, but Australian global health policy (including through the Kirby Institute and Burnet Institute partnerships) should incorporate these findings into program design. Health system planners, public health practitioners, disaster preparedness coordinators, and community health workers operating in LIC and LMIC settings globally, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia where extreme weather event frequency and health system vulnerability intersect
Abstract
Most previous research about the dangers of extreme weather events was applicable to populations in high-income countries. Data summarising harms related to extreme weather events in low-income settings are lacking. A systematic review thematically summarising evidence about weather event-linked harms and responses in low- and lower-middle-income countries was conducted. Peer-reviewed and grey literature was systematically searched and selected. Data were extracted about harms, responses and outcomes relevant to six WHO building blocks of healthcare systems. Framework analysis was used to identify predominant themes related to harms, responses and the WHO building blocks. In total, 183 reports were included. Flooding and high winds were the most common types of extreme weather events documented. The main community experience themes identified were the displacement of populations and disruption. The main themes identified for health service delivery were vulnerability, disruption and resilience. Documented examples of resilience or recovery were far fewer for all six WHO healthcare system building blocks than descriptions of vulnerability and disruption. Extreme weather events can be highly disruptive and harmful to healthcare systems and communities in LMIC settings that are often already highly vulnerable.
References
- 1.Brainard, J., Sedekia, Y., Jones, N. R., Matte, M., Sunday, P., Watson-Jones, D., Mapemba, D. D., Kabakama, S. A., Mulogo, E. M., Ntaro, M., Tuyet-Hanh, T. T., Hunter, P. R., & Geere, J. A. (2026). Extreme weather effects on health services and communities in low and lower-middle income countries: a thematic systematic review. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trag007
Related Research
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Digital epidemiology investments, Saudi Arabia
2 Aug 2026
Current obesity reports
A Systematic Review of Community-based Interventions to Promote Physical Activity or Reduce Sedentary Behavior among Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
23 July 2026
Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG
The use of artificial intelligence in advancing molecular biology in Africa: a narrative review
23 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service