Research Appraisalobservational

Exploring Attitudes Toward AI-Based Contactless Sensors in Health Among Five Stakeholder Groups: Qualitative Study

Journal of medical Internet researchHille, Eva Maria, Bleher, Hannah, Coppers, Birte et al.24 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

85CEBM
Evidence: Moderateobservational

PICO Framework

P — PopulationFive stakeholder groups: patients, healthcare professionals, researchers, political stakeholders, and general public (n=104)
I — InterventionSemi-structured interviews exploring attitudes toward AI-based contactless sensors in health
C — ComparatorNot applicable - descriptive qualitative study
O — OutcomesAttitudes (feelings, thoughts, behavioral aspects) toward AI-based contactless sensors in healthcare

Bottom Line

This multi-stakeholder qualitative study of 104 participants found generally positive attitudes toward AI-based contactless sensors in healthcare across patients, clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and the public. Key findings reveal that experience and knowledge reduce emotional responses, while positive technology experiences increase acceptance. Three critical tensions emerged: the trade-off between contactless convenience and the value of human touch, the balance between health protection and surveillance concerns, and the benefits versus governance challenges of unobtrusive monitoring. The study highlights the need for clear information, consent processes, and governance frameworks. For Australian healthcare, these findings support cautious implementation of contactless sensor technologies, provided robust consent and privacy protections align with TGA requirements and digital health frameworks.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not applicable - qualitative study

  • Effect Size: Not applicable - qualitative study

  • Primary Outcome: High level of openness to AI-based contactless sensors across all stakeholder groups

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Three key tensions identified: contact(lessness) vs touch importance, protection vs surveillance, benefits vs challenges of unobtrusiveness

  • Confidence Interval: Not applicable - qualitative study

Clinical Application

High stakeholder acceptance suggests feasible implementation, but governance and consent frameworks needed Relevant to TGA medical device regulation and RACGP digital health guidelines; aligns with Australia's Digital Health Strategy for remote monitoring Healthcare professionals, patients, and healthcare organisations considering AI-based contactless sensor implementation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid rise of artificial intelligence-based contactless sensors (AI-CS) is expected to significantly transform how patients are measured, monitored, and understood through a versatile, noninvasive approach to data collection and health assessment. However, there is a lack of empirical research specifically focusing on AI-CS in health. Moreover, existing studies tend to focus on medical or patient perspectives, while neglecting other stakeholders such as researchers, political actors, or the general public. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to provide an in-depth empirical ethical analysis and, through a multistakeholder approach, a uniquely comprehensive overview by addressing the research question: what are the attitudes of different stakeholders (patients, health care professionals, researchers, political stakeholders, and the general public) toward AI-CS and their applications in health? METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study with 104 participants using a semistructured interview guide. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with ATLAS.ti software (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH), following a 3-component model of feelings, thoughts, and behavioral aspects. RESULTS: The results of the study provide an in-depth analysis of attitudes toward AI-CS in health among different stakeholders. Overall, the results show a high level of openness to AI-CS in health across all stakeholder groups. In terms of feelings and their correlation with behavioral aspects, 2 key trends emerged: first, greater experience and knowledge correlated with a reduced tendency to react emotionally. Second, participants with positive experiences with technologies were generally more open and positive toward contactless sensors. The combined findings on thoughts and behavioral aspects highlighted 3 key tensions-around contact(lessness) and the importance and ambivalence of touch, between protection and surveillance (particularly regarding path- and context-dependency) and between the benefits and challenges of unobtrusiveness (especially in relation to control and governance implications). In addition, the analysis revealed the need for information and consent about AI-CS and clarified possible technical implementations and fields of application. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive and empirically grounded ethical analysis of stakeholder attitudes toward AI-CS in health. The findings offer valuable guidance for the responsible development, implementation, and governance of AI-CS in health care contexts.

References

  1. 1.Hille, E. M., Bleher, H., Coppers, B., Engelhardt, S., Eskofier, B., Garbe, L., Heckel, M., Liphardt, A.-M., Manlig, A., Rohleder, N., Samhammer, D., Spielmann, C., & Braun, M. (2026). Exploring attitudes toward AI-based contactless sensors in health among five stakeholder groups: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/75783
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service