Explainable artificial intelligence predicts inflammatory and spatial heterogeneity from nasal polyp histology
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) from 4 medical centers (n=324 total: 70 training, 30 internal validation, 224 external validation) |
| I — Intervention | HE2Signature deep learning model analysis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide histology images |
| C — Comparator | Actual endotypic signature gene expression profiles from transcriptomic data and immunohistochemistry validation |
| O — Outcomes | Prediction accuracy of inflammatory gene signatures (28/33 genes), endotype classification (T1, T2, T3), spatial molecular heterogeneity mapping, correlation with clinical scores |
Bottom Line
This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that deep learning analysis of routine H&E histology can predict inflammatory gene signatures and endotypes in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. The HE2Signature model achieved strong diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.833-0.935) for endotype classification in internal validation, with more modest external validation performance (AUC 0.716). The approach offers potential for precision medicine by identifying T2-high patients who may benefit from targeted biologics, using readily available histological specimens rather than expensive molecular testing. However, the study requires validation in larger, more diverse cohorts with detailed methodology reporting before clinical implementation. The correlation with clinical severity scores suggests practical utility, but cost-effectiveness compared to existing biomarkers needs evaluation. This represents an innovative application of computational pathology that could democratize molecular endotyping in routine clinical practice.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported in abstract
Effect Size: Strong correlations for 28/33 signature genes
Primary Outcome: Prediction accuracy of inflammatory gene signatures and endotype classification
Nnt Or Sensitivity: AUC values: T1 (0.833), T2 (0.903), T3 (0.935) for internal validation; T2 endotype AUC 0.716 in external cohort
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
High - utilizes standard H&E histology available in all pathology laboratories. Requires computational infrastructure for deep learning model deployment Highly relevant to Australian ENT practice. Could inform PBS-subsidized biologic therapy decisions (dupilumab, mepolizumab). Aligns with RACGP chronic rhinosinusitis management guidelines emphasizing phenotyping Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps requiring endotype classification for precision medicine approaches
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by diverse inflammatory signatures and endotypes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a histology-based deep learning network for predicting inflammatory gene signatures and spatial patterns in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. METHODS: We developed HE2Signature, a deep learning model, using 70 hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images of nasal polyps paired with corresponding endotypic signature gene expression profiles derived from transcriptomic data. The model was validated in an internal cohort (n = 30) and tested in an independent external cohort (n = 224) from 4 medical centers. The performance was evaluated using correlation and confusion matrix analyses and receiver-operating characteristic curves. Spatial predictions were validated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The HE2Signature demonstrated strong positive correlations between the predicted and actual expression levels of 28 of the 33 signature genes. The internal validation cohort was stratified into distinct endotypes on the basis of predicted signature gene expression, achieving area under the curve values of 0.833, 0.903, and 0.935 for the T1, T2, and T3 endotypes, respectively. In the external cohort, the combination of HE2Signature-predicted Fc epsilon receptor II and CST1 effectively identified the T2 endotype, with a receiver-operating characteristic value of 0.716. Histopathologic examination of high-prediction patches revealed characteristic features associated with signature gene expression. Heatmaps and immunohistochemistry confirmed the accuracy of the model in mapping spatial gene expression patterns. HE2Signature-predicted spatial expression of signature genes correlated with blood and tissue eosinophil counts, Lund-Kennedy score, and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 score, particularly within subepithelial regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study introduces the first histology-based, explainable deep learning model capable of predicting inflammatory gene signatures and spatial molecular heterogeneity. This proof-of-concept highlights that artificial intelligence-powered histopathologic analysis can generate digital biomarkers by linking tissue patterns with molecular profiles, providing a clinically applicable framework for endotype-guided precision medicine in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
References
- 1.Wang, K., Ren, Y., Ma, L., Han, L., Xu, L., Guan, H., Cui, Y., Wu, L., Liu, C., Liu, W., Wang, J., Liu, H., Fan, Y., Shi, J., & Sun, Y. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence predicts inflammatory and spatial heterogeneity from nasal polyp histology. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2025.08.016
Related Research
Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung
Which nocturnal hypoxemia parameters are associated with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in adults with obstructive sleep apnea? A systematic review.
5 July 2026
Signal transduction and targeted therapy
Liposomal doxorubicin plus nab-paclitaxel with/without chemoradiotherapy in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: single-arm phase II study
14 June 2026
PloS one
Internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus written instructions after acute vertigo: A randomised controlled trial
14 June 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service