Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Graduate Medical Students Regarding AI in Syria: Cross-Sectional Study

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: P<0.001 for examination preparation differences, P=0.004 for gender differences in research usage

• Effect Size: Clinical students significantly higher AI usage than graduates for examination preparation, case creation, and writing tasks

• Primary Outcome: AI tool usage for study preparation (57% of participants), assignments (40%), and research activities

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: 76% believe AI would enhance residency training, 71.8% support institutional policies, only 25.5% expect career benefits

• Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Survey methodology easily replicable, but findings may not translate to different educational and technological contexts Limited direct applicability due to different healthcare system, technology infrastructure, and medical education standards. Australian medical schools have more established AI integration policies and resources Medical students and educators in resource-limited settings, though generalisability to developed healthcare systems uncertain

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have revolutionized various aspects of education and health care in recent years. Their influence extends across multiple domains of medical education, from traditional learning to research and foreign language acquisition. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the experiences and perceptions of AI tools usage in a low-resource setting and identify the factors influencing their adoption. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the experiences with AI tools and perceptions regarding their future applications in education and health care among medical students in Syria. The sample was equally divided between clinical-year students and graduates. Chi-square tests analyzed differences based on demographics and experience, while Mann-Whitney U tests compared group perceptions of AI's future role. Factors studied included academic year, gender, German language learning, computer access, and research experience. RESULTS: Among 400 participants, AI tools were widely used for study preparation (228/400, 57% of participants), assignments (160/400, 40% of participants), and research. Clinical students used AI more than graduates for examination preparation (P<.001), creating cases (P=.03), and writing tasks (P<.001). Males used AI more for research (P=.004) or anatomy (P=.02); German learners relied on AI for language tasks. Despite 76% (304/400) of students believing AI would enhance residency training and 71.8% (287/400) of students supporting institutional policies, only 25.5% (102/400) of students expected career benefits. Ethical concerns were higher among females and researchers. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the increasing reliance on AI tools among medical students and graduates for academic and clinical purposes. The highest usage was reported in study preparation, writing tasks, and clinical simulations. Significant differences in AI usage were observed based on academic level, gender, access to technology, and research experience. While perceptions were largely positive, concerns remained around ethical use, potential job displacement, and diminished human interaction in medicine. These findings underscore the importance of developing institutional policies to guide the ethical and effective integration of AI in medical education.

References

1. 1.Aljoudeh, J., Al Balkhi, A., Ranjous, Y., Shbani, A., Takieddin, D., & Bashar Izzat, M. (2026). Experiences and perceptions of clinical and graduate medical students regarding AI in Syria: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.2196/84942