Evaluation of the quality, reliability, and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses related to the treatment and rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 56 frequently asked questions about cerebral palsy treatment and rehabilitation from families |
| I — Intervention | ChatGPT-4 generated responses to cerebral palsy questions |
| C — Comparator | No direct comparator - evaluation against validated assessment tools |
| O — Outcomes | Reliability (mDISCERN), quality (GQS), and readability (Flesch Reading Ease Scale) of AI responses |
Bottom Line
This cross-sectional study evaluated ChatGPT-4 responses to 56 cerebral palsy questions using validated assessment tools. Results showed moderate reliability (mDISCERN median 3-4/5) and quality (GQS median 3-3.5/5) but poor readability for families. While AI tools may provide general cerebral palsy information, the moderate quality scores and low readability highlight significant limitations. Healthcare professionals should exercise caution when families use AI for medical information, particularly for complex conditions like cerebral palsy requiring individualised care. The study's methodology has limitations including unclear question selection and lack of comparison with professional advice. Australian clinicians should consider cultural differences and local healthcare contexts when interpreting these findings for practice.
Key Findings
P Value: No statistically significant differences between question categories
Effect Size: mDISCERN scores: median 3-4 (scale 1-5), GQS scores: median 3-3.5 (scale 1-5)
Primary Outcome: ChatGPT-4 responses showed moderate reliability and quality for cerebral palsy information
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Inter-rater reliability: ICC 0.851 (mDISCERN), ICC 0.824 (GQS)
Confidence Interval: Not reported - descriptive study design
Clinical Application
AI tools increasingly accessible but require healthcare professional oversight Relevant to Australian families but cultural adaptation needed. Consider NDIS context for cerebral palsy support. TGA has no specific AI health information regulations yet Families seeking information about cerebral palsy treatment and rehabilitation
Abstract
UNLABELLED: This study aims to evaluate the reliability, quality, and readability of ChatGPT-4's responses to questions about cerebral palsy (CP) and rehabilitation strategies. The 56 most frequently asked questions by families about CP, its treatment, and rehabilitation strategies were divided into five categories (A1-5) and asked in ChatGPT-4. The reliability, quality, and readability of the responses were assessed by two researchers, respectively, using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Flesch Reading Ease Scale (FRE). Median (IQR) values for mDISCERN ranged from 3 (3-3) in A5 to 4 (3-4) in A1, while GQS values ranged from 3 (3-3.5) in A2 to 3.5 (3-4) in A1. The mean readability values assessed with FRE ranged from 31.47 ± 12.92 to 44.84 ± 17.39. No statistically significant differences were observed between the categories. The ICC values suggested very good agreement for both scales, with 0.851 for the mDISCERN total score and 0.824 for the GQS total score. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that ChatGPT-4 provides moderate reliability and generally acceptable quality of responses regarding CP treatment and rehabilitation. FRE scores indicated that many responses were difficult for families to understand. While ChatGPT-4 may serve as a supportive source of general information, its outputs should be interpreted with caution, particularly in clinical contexts, and supervision and oversight by healthcare professionals remain essential for safe and effective use. WHAT'S KNOWN: • Children with cerebral palsy (CP) receive lifelong rehabilitation. Exercise plays a fundamental role in maintaining functional independence and quality of life, as well as physical development. The use of AI-based tools such as ChatGPT-4 for health information is increasingly widespread; however, uncertainties regarding the reliability, quality,and readability of these tools remain. WHAT IS NEW: • Our study shows that ChatGPT-4''s responses to questions about treatment and rehabilitation strategies for children with CP have moderate to good reliability and quality, but low readability.
References
- 1.Zorlular, R., & Zorlular, A. (2026). Evaluation of the quality, reliability, and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses related to the treatment and rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. European Journal of Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04198-4
Related Research
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
Augmentative and Alternative Communication Generative Language Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
13 June 2026
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
Rhotic Generalization Is More Rapid in Biofeedback Than Motor-Based Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial
12 Apr 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service