Enhancing the sustainability of cultural identity in science curricula through artificial intelligence as an innovative educational approach
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Science teachers (n=47) from Al-Qassim and Al-Ahsa regions, Saudi Arabia, with experience in technology-enhanced instruction |
| I — Intervention | AI-integrated instructional practices within science curricula, including culturally contextualised content delivery, collaborative learning activities, and AI-supported assessment |
| C — Comparator | No formal comparator group; study examines perceptions and observed practices without a control condition |
| O — Outcomes | Teachers' perceptions of AI as an instructional mechanism; classroom practices related to cultural identity integration; observed student engagement and collaborative learning behaviours |
Bottom Line
This qualitative study from Saudi Arabia explores how 47 science teachers perceive AI as a tool for integrating cultural identity into science curricula. Using semi-structured interviews and classroom observations, the authors identify themes around AI enabling culturally contextualised instruction, fostering collaborative learning, and supporting responsive assessment. The study's principal value lies in addressing an underexplored intersection of AI, cultural relevance, and science pedagogy in a non-Western context, and in its commendable transparency about methodological limitations. However, several serious concerns limit confidence in the findings. The methodological design is internally inconsistent — grounded theory coding procedures are applied without a grounded theory framework and without data saturation. Reflexivity is absent, ethics governance is undocumented, and analytical rigour cannot be fully evaluated. Critically, all findings rest on teacher perceptions and observations, with no direct measurement of student learning or cultural identity outcomes. Additionally, significant bibliographic anomalies — including a DOI that does not match the stated journal and an invalid publication date — raise concerns about source verifiability. Clinicians and educators should treat these findings as hypothesis-generating only. The study does not provide sufficient evidence to guide practice change but may inform the design of more rigorous future research into culturally responsive AI-enhanced pedagogy.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable — qualitative study
Effect Size: Not applicable — qualitative study; no quantitative effect sizes reported
Primary Outcome: Teachers perceive AI as a supportive instructional mechanism enabling contextualisation of scientific concepts within local cultural settings, rather than merely a knowledge transmission tool
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable — qualitative study; transferability is limited to similar Saudi Arabian science education contexts with technology-experienced teachers
Confidence Interval: Not applicable — qualitative study
Clinical Application
Findings are conceptually applicable to professional development planning for teachers integrating AI tools into culturally responsive pedagogy. However, the absence of student outcome data, validated AI tools, or implementation protocols limits direct operational translation. Feasibility in resource-limited settings is not addressed. While this study is set in Saudi Arabia, its themes have relevance to Australian science education contexts, particularly regarding culturally responsive pedagogy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students, and for students from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. The Australian Curriculum (ACARA) emphasises cross-curriculum priorities including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures, and the Melbourne Declaration supports culturally inclusive education. AITSL (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership) professional standards for teachers include cultural competency requirements. However, direct application requires caution: the Saudi Arabian cultural, linguistic, and institutional context differs substantially from Australian settings. PBS and TGA are not relevant to this educational research study. RACGP guidelines are not applicable. Science educators and curriculum developers working in culturally diverse or non-Western educational contexts; education policymakers considering AI integration in national science curricula
Abstract
This study investigates the role of AI as an innovative educational approach in promoting the sustainability of cultural identity within science curricula. To achieve this aim, a qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews and classroom observations as primary data collection methods. The study sample consisted of forty-seven science teachers from the Al-Qassim and Al-Ahsa regions in Saudi Arabia, selected purposively based on their experience with technology-enhanced instruction. The collected data were analyzed using systematic qualitative procedures involving open and axial coding, which facilitated the emergence of key categories related to AI integration, cultural relevance, and instructional practices. Accordingly, the analytical process is best understood as an inductive thematic qualitative approach rather than a full grounded theory methodology, as it does not include theoretical sampling, data saturation, or iterative cycles of data collection. This clarification ensures methodological transparency and alignment between design and analysis. Findings derived from both teachers' perceptions and classroom observations indicate that AI is not perceived merely as a tool for knowledge transmission, but rather as a supportive instructional mechanism that enables the contextualization of scientific concepts within local cultural settings. In addition, AI-supported instructional practices appear to foster more interactive and collaborative classroom environments, while also contributing to more responsive approaches to assessment. However, it is important to emphasize that these findings are based on teachers' reported perceptions and observed instructional practices rather than direct measurement of student learning outcomes. Despite this limitation, classroom observations suggest that integrating culturally relevant examples, analyzing cultural texts, and designing collaborative, culturally responsive learning activities may enhance student engagement and strengthen their connection to cultural identity within science learning contexts. Overall, the study highlights the potential of AI to bridge scientific knowledge and local cultural heritage in science education. It contributes to the growing body of literature on AI in education by emphasizing its role in fostering culturally responsive pedagogy and enhancing meaningful learning experiences. The study further underscores the importance of providing teachers with targeted professional development in AI integration, developing culturally responsive instructional materials, and designing assessment practices that address both conceptual understanding and cultural dimensions of learning.
References
- 1.Alrashood, J., Al-Hassan, O., Alotaibi, S., Alrosaa, T., AlAli, R., Al-Barakat, A., Ismail, A., Aboud, Y., Abdullatif, A., & Zaher, A. (2026). Enhancing the sustainability of cultural identity in science curricula through artificial intelligence as an innovative educational approach. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101698 [Note: DOI corresponds to International Journal of Educational Research (Elsevier); bibliographic record contains anomalies requiring verification]
Related Research
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
Artificial Intelligence Tools for Gastrointestinal Research: A Practical Guide
2 Aug 2026
Artificial intelligence in medicine
Artificial intelligence language models for medical text analysis: A systematic review
2 Aug 2026
Surgery
Artificial intelligence to revolutionize surgical decision-making is still just around the corner.
1 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service