Engagement of Users in Digital Health Applications: Scoping Review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Users of mobile health (mHealth) applications and digital health interventions |
| I — Intervention | Digital health applications and mHealth interventions |
| C — Comparator | Not applicable (scoping review examining engagement concepts) |
| O — Outcomes | User engagement attributes, definitions, methods, barriers and facilitators |
Bottom Line
This comprehensive scoping review synthesizes 25 years of literature on mHealth user engagement, identifying four key conceptual approaches. The authors propose that effective engagement requires integrating both quantitative usage metrics and subjective user experiences, while recognizing the dynamic, context-dependent nature of user participation. The finding that engagement should be viewed as a mechanism enabling users to achieve health objectives has important implications for Australian digital health initiatives. However, the heterogeneity of engagement definitions across studies highlights the need for standardized frameworks. The planned e-Delphi consensus study will be crucial for developing practical engagement criteria. For Australian clinicians implementing mHealth solutions, this review emphasizes the importance of user-centered design and continuous evaluation throughout intervention lifecycles.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable for scoping review
Effect Size: Not applicable for scoping review
Primary Outcome: Four main perspectives on mHealth engagement identified: usage metrics, subjective user experiences, hybrid approach, and goal-oriented perspective
Nnt Or Sensitivity: 52 studies included from 1416 screened (3.7% inclusion rate)
Confidence Interval: Not applicable for scoping review
Clinical Application
Highly feasible - provides conceptual framework for improving mHealth engagement strategies Relevant to Australian digital health initiatives including My Health Record, telehealth expansion, and PBS-funded digital therapeutics. Aligns with TGA guidance on software as medical devices Healthcare providers implementing mHealth interventions, digital health researchers, and health technology developers
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) uses mobile technology as a tool for prevention and health promotion. Research indicates that user engagement is crucial for effective mHealth interventions and improved health outcomes. However, many studies report low adoption rates, rapid decline after initial use, and a lack of acknowledgment of user implications in achieving outcomes. Thus, conceptualizing participation in mHealth is essential to identify key determinants for engaging users. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify and characterize the attributes and definitions of user engagement in mHealth, examine engagement methods, and analyze barriers and facilitators influencing participation. METHODS: Following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases were searched for publications between 2000 and 2025 with a 2-stage selection process. RESULTS: Out of 2489 articles identified, 1416 were screened, and 52 met the inclusion criteria. Half were recently published in the last 5 years (2020-2025). Existing literature focused on digital interventions for specific populations and health topics. Analysis revealed four main perspectives on engagement in mHealth: (1) usage metrics, (2) subjective user experiences, (3) a hybrid approach that combines both, and (4) a goal-oriented perspective (behavior change or health outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: To understand the complexity and multifactorial nature of participation, it is relevant to conceptualize it as a dynamic mechanism enabling users to achieve their objectives. Both quantitative use and subjective user experience should be integrated to reach the optimal intervention dose. Recognizing users' evolving needs, uniqueness, and their socioenvironmental context interdependence, it is essential to involve users in all stages (design, implementation, and iterative evaluation of mHealth). Findings will inform an e-Delphi study to establish consensus on engagement criteria.
References
- 1.Aktas, M., Cambon, L., & Aromatario, O. (2026). Engagement of Users in Digital Health Applications: Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. https://doi.org/10.2196/66002
Related Research
The Journal of rheumatology
Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review
3 Aug 2026
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ChatGPT in urogynecology: Comparing large language model responses to human experts
3 Aug 2026
Sleep medicine
Concordance of wearable device sleep metrics with patient-reported sleep quality: A systematic review
3 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service