Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Emotion regulation-targeted interventions initiated during hospitalization for suicidal crisis: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis

Journal of affective disordersSaccaro, Luigi F, Giff, Alexis E, Parincu, Zamfira et al.15 June 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

70CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPsychiatric inpatients with suicidal ideation and/or behavior (adolescents and adults, transdiagnostic)
I — InterventionEmotion regulation-targeted interventions (dialectical behavior therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy, other ER protocols)
C — ComparatorUsual care or control conditions
O — OutcomesSuicide attempts, suicidal ideation, and other suicide-related outcomes

Bottom Line

This systematic review provides preliminary evidence that emotion regulation-targeted interventions (including DBT, mindfulness, and ACT) delivered during psychiatric hospitalization show promise for reducing suicide-related outcomes in both adolescents and adults. While the interventions demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability across 12 studies (n=1708), significant heterogeneity and small sample sizes limit confidence in the findings. The authors appropriately characterize their meta-analyses as exploratory and emphasize the need for larger, well-powered randomized trials with standardized endpoints before these interventions can be routinely recommended for acute inpatient care. Clinicians should view these findings as encouraging but preliminary, requiring further validation before implementation as standard care protocols.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not specified in abstract

  • Effect Size: Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) favoring ER interventions

  • Primary Outcome: Suicide attempts and suicidal ideation

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data

  • Confidence Interval: Not specified in abstract

Clinical Application

High feasibility and acceptability reported across intervention modalities during psychiatric hospitalization Relevant to Australian mental health services given universal applicability of ER interventions; aligns with RANZCP guidelines for suicide prevention in inpatient settings Psychiatric inpatients with suicidal ideation or behavior across diagnostic categories, both adolescent and adult populations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Suicide is a leading cause of premature death, with risk peaking around psychiatric hospitalization. Emotion dysregulation (ED) is recognized as a key factor contributing to suicidal ideation and behavior across psychiatric diagnoses. The efficacy of interventions that target ED for suicidality reduction remains unclear, so we aimed to assess these interventions in psychiatric inpatients. METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant, PROSPERO-registered (CRD420251140949) systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials evaluating interventions targeting emotion regulation (ER) for psychiatric inpatients with suicidal ideation and/or behavior. Searches covered PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO to September 18, 2025. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were pooled under random-effects models and heterogeneity was assessed (Q, I2, τ2). Exploratory meta-regressions examined age, sex, and study quality; small-study effects were explored with funnel plots. RESULTS: Twelve studies met inclusion (n = 1708), spanning dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and other ER-related protocols. Across modalities, feasibility and acceptability were high and interventions consistently improved suicide-related outcomes in transdiagnostic adolescents and adult populations. Suicide attempts and ideation met outcome criteria for exploratory meta-analyses, and, for both, ER-targeted interventions outperformed usual care, despite heterogeneity and small samples. Exploratory meta-regressions were non-significant; funnel plots did not suggest marked publication bias, though power was limited. CONCLUSIONS: ER-targeted interventions delivered during psychiatric hospitalization are feasible and show promising benefits on suicide-related outcomes. Given heterogeneity and limited sample sizes, larger, well-powered randomized trials using standardized suicidality endpoints are needed to establish efficacy, refine inpatient protocols, and inform acute care pathways.

References

  1. 1.Saccaro, L. F., Giff, A. E., Parincu, Z., Piguet, C., Greiner, C., & Prada, P. (2026). Emotion regulation-targeted interventions initiated during hospitalization for suicidal crisis: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 121375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121375
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service