Research Appraisalother

Emotion-Adaptive Large Language Model-Driven Clinical Decision Support: User Evaluation of the Empathic Clinical Decision Support System Framework for Trust and Explainability

JMIR human factorsZhang, Tongze, Bae, Sang Won, Chung, Tammy et al.22 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

55CEBM
Evidence: Weakother

PICO Framework

P — Population33 participants with diverse medical and technical backgrounds
I — InterventionEmpathic clinical decision support system (empathic-CDSS) with emotion recognition and adaptive explanations
C — ComparatorBaseline clinical decision support system without emotion adaptation
O — OutcomesUsability, personalization, clarity, system benefits, satisfaction, trust and reliability

Bottom Line

This user evaluation study introduces an innovative empathic clinical decision support system that adapts explanations based on users' emotional states. While the concept of emotion-adaptive AI explanations is promising for enhancing clinician trust and understanding, the study has significant methodological limitations including small sample size, lack of statistical detail, and unclear generalizability. The integration of emotion recognition with clinical decision support raises important questions about privacy, accuracy, and clinical utility that require further investigation. Australian clinicians should await more robust validation studies before considering implementation, particularly given the complex regulatory landscape around AI in healthcare and the need for evidence of clinical benefit beyond user satisfaction metrics.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported

  • Effect Size: Not specified in abstract

  • Primary Outcome: Significantly improved usability, clarity, satisfaction, and trust compared to baseline system

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable for this study type

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

Requires significant technical infrastructure for emotion recognition and LLM integration; implementation complexity may limit adoption Relevant to Australian digital health initiatives and AI in healthcare frameworks, though regulatory considerations for emotion monitoring in clinical settings unclear Clinicians using AI-assisted decision support systems, particularly in behavioral health and cannabis use monitoring

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of cannabis use has motivated researchers to develop computational behavioral models that predict usage patterns and related health impacts in naturalistic environments. However, the opaque nature of many artificial intelligence (AI) systems limits users' ability to interpret outputs and undermines trust. Existing explainable artificial intelligence techniques often remain overly technical and do not account for the confusion or frustration clinicians may experience when interpreting complex model explanations. OBJECTIVE: We propose and evaluate an empathic clinical decision support system (empathic-CDSS) that integrates large language models (LLMs) with real-time emotion recognition and explainability modules. The goal is to provide transparent, adaptive, and emotionally attuned explanations that enhance interpretability, user confidence, and trust in AI-assisted clinical decision-making. METHODS: Our empathic-CDSS integrates explainable artificial intelligence, causal inference, and affective computing within an interactive LLM-driven framework. Users' affective states were inferred using the circumplex model of affect, which characterizes emotions along 2 dimensions: valence (the degree of pleasure or displeasure) and arousal (the level of physiological activation or energy). Based on the captured emotional signals, the system dynamically adjusts the tone, structure, style, and complexity of its explanations generated by a fine-tuned LLM, enabling personalized and plain-language explanations. A total of 33 participants with diverse medical and technical backgrounds engaged with the system through guided evaluation tasks and postsession assessments to evaluate 6 dimensions of user-centered questions: usability, personalization and relevance of insights, clarity and comprehensibility, system benefits, satisfaction, and trust and reliability. RESULTS: Our empathic-CDSS effectively generated personalized and transparent explanations that revealed the causal reasoning behind model predictions while enhancing users' emotional engagement and trust in the system's decision logic. Continuous, affect-based feedback enabled the system to dynamically adapt explanation delivery to individual user needs. Participants reported significantly improved usability, clarity, satisfaction, and trust compared with a baseline clinical decision support system without emotion adaptation. Improvements were also observed across additional evaluation dimensions, including personalization and perceived system benefits, supporting the feasibility and added value of integrating empathy-aware communication into AI-driven clinical decision support. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces a transparent, trustworthy, and emotionally adaptive framework for AI-assisted prediction and clinical decision support. By uniting causal reasoning, affective sensing, and LLM-based natural-language explanations, the empathic-CDSS offers a novel direction for developing emotionally intelligent and user-centered AI systems, with potential applications in behavioral monitoring and personalized interventions, including cannabis use and related health domains.

References

  1. 1.Zhang, T., Bae, S. W., Chung, T., & Dey, A. K. (2026). Emotion-adaptive large language model-driven clinical decision support: User evaluation of the empathic clinical decision support system framework for trust and explainability. JMIR Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.2196/89005
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service