Efficacy and Safety of Ultra-Low-Dose Immunotherapy in Relapsed Refractory Solid Tumors: Phase III Superiority Randomized Trial (DELII)
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults with advanced solid tumors (ECOG 0-1) who progressed on ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy, predominantly head and neck (52%) and lung cancers (36%) |
| I — Intervention | Ultra-low-dose nivolumab 20 mg intravenously every 2 weeks |
| C — Comparator | Standard chemotherapy (docetaxel or paclitaxel based on tumor type) |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: overall survival. Secondary: progression-free survival, treatment-related adverse events, quality of life |
Bottom Line
This phase III trial demonstrates that ultra-low-dose nivolumab (20mg every 2 weeks) significantly improves overall survival compared to standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors, while substantially reducing severe toxicities and improving quality of life. The 1.18-month median survival benefit, 20% reduction in death risk, and dramatic reduction in grade ≥3 adverse events (42.5% vs 60.8%) represent clinically meaningful improvements. The findings challenge current dosing paradigms and suggest potential for major cost savings without compromising efficacy. However, the open-label design and limited baseline data reporting warrant cautious interpretation. If validated in additional studies, this approach could revolutionise immunotherapy accessibility globally and significantly impact PBS funding decisions in Australia, potentially making this life-extending treatment available to many more patients.
Key Findings
P Value: P = 0.022
Effect Size: Hazard ratio 0.80 (20% reduction in death risk)
Primary Outcome: Median overall survival: 5.88 months (ultra-low nivolumab) vs 4.70 months (chemotherapy)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Number needed to treat approximately 10 patients to prevent one additional death at 1 year (based on 10.4% absolute survival difference)
Confidence Interval: 95% CI 0.66 to 0.97
Clinical Application
Highly feasible - uses existing infrastructure, reduces drug costs substantially, and decreases toxicity burden Significant implications for PBS funding given potential 90% cost reduction while maintaining efficacy. May require TGA review of current nivolumab dosing recommendations. Aligns with COSA guidelines for palliative care focusing on quality of life Australian patients with advanced solid tumors who have progressed on standard therapy, particularly head and neck and lung cancers
Abstract
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieve sufficient receptor occupancy at much lower than standard approved doses. We hypothesized that ultra-low-dose nivolumab would retain clinical efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase III randomized superiority trial, patients with advanced solid tumors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1) and progression on ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to ultra-low-dose nivolumab (20 mg intravenously once every 2 weeks) or standard chemotherapy (docetaxel or paclitaxel, as per tumor type). Treatment continued until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From June 2020 to February 2024, we enrolled 500 patients: 250 per arm; 52% had head and neck and 36% lung cancers. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (range, 1-8); 29% had received ≥2 prior lines. Median OS was significantly longer with ultra-low-dose nivolumab: 5.88 months (95% CI, 4.99 to 7.13) versus 4.70 months (95% CI, 3.91 to 5.65; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97]; P = .022). One-year OS was 27.3% versus 16.9%. Median progression-free survival was similar: 2.04 months (95% CI, 2.00 to 2.10) with ultra-low-dose nivolumab and 2.09 months (95% CI, 2.04 to 2.17) with chemotherapy (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.23]; P = .77). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were less frequent with ultra-low-dose nivolumab (42.5% v 60.8%; P < .001). Quality of life (QoL) was significantly better with ultra-low-dose nivolumab. CONCLUSION: Ultra-low-dose nivolumab significantly improves OS versus chemotherapy in pretreated solid tumors, with fewer severe toxicities and better QoL. These findings support re-evaluation of ICI dosing strategies and may enhance global access.
References
- 1.Noronha, V., Patil, V., Menon, N., Shah, M., Ostwal, V., Ramaswamy, A., Bhargava, P., Shah, S., Nawale, K., Shetake, A., Mathrudev, V., Sahu, L., Mehta, S., Deshmukh, C., Gaikwad, S., Chavan, S., Narayan, R., Ingale, R., Dhumal, S., Kaushal, R. K., Pai, T., Purandare, N., Janu, A., Chakrabarty, N., Sahu, A., Haria, P., Vaidyanathan, A., Trikha, M., Gedela, S., Banavali, S., Badwe, R. A., & Prabhash, K. (2026). Efficacy and safety of ultra-low-dose immunotherapy in relapsed refractory solid tumors: Phase III superiority randomized trial (DELII). Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-01546
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service