Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide 14 mg (flexible dose) in early-stage symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (evoke and evoke+): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: evoke: p=0.57; evoke+: p=0.46

• Effect Size: evoke: -0.08 difference; evoke+: 0.10 difference (favouring neither group)

• Primary Outcome: Change in CDR-SB score from baseline to week 104

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable - no significant treatment benefit demonstrated

• Confidence Interval: evoke: 95% CI -0.35 to 0.20; evoke+: 95% CI -0.17 to 0.38

Clinical Application

Limited feasibility given lack of efficacy and higher adverse event profile. Oral administration would be convenient if effective Results not supportive of TGA approval or PBS listing. Aligns with RACGP guidelines emphasising evidence-based dementia treatments. Current PBS-listed dementia medications remain standard of care Adults with early-stage Alzheimer's disease confirmed by amyloid biomarkers, particularly those aged 55-85 years with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence, including animal, clinical, and real-world studies in individuals with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, suggests reduced risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease after GLP-1 receptor agonist exposure. The evoke and evoke+ trials aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in individuals with early Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: evoke and evoke+ were multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials conducted across 566 sites in 40 countries. The trials assessed the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide up to 14 mg once daily in participants with amyloid-confirmed Alzheimer's disease, aged 55-85 years, with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. In evoke+, participants with significant small vessel pathology were included. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to once-daily semaglutide 14 mg (flexible dose) or placebo for up to 156 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score from baseline to week 104, assessed in all randomised participants. Safety was assessed in all randomised participants and reported for those receiving at least one dose of study drug. These trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04777396 and NCT04777409); both trials have been discontinued due to negative clinical outcome. FINDINGS: Between May 18, 2021, and Sept 8, 2023, 9981 participants were screened, of whom 3808 were randomly assigned; 1855 in evoke (semaglutide, n=928; placebo, n=927) and 1953 in evoke+ (semaglutide, n=976; placebo, n=977). Mean age was 72·2 years (SD 7·1), and mean CDR-SB score was 3·7 (SD 1·6) at baseline. In evoke+, 54 (2·8%) participants had small vessel pathology. In evoke and evoke+, mean changes in CDR-SB score from baseline to week 104 were 2·3 (SE 0·1) and 2·2 (0·1) with semaglutide, compared with 2·3 (0·1) and 2·1 (0·1) with placebo (estimated difference -0·08 [95% CI -0·35 to 0·20], p=0·57 in evoke and 0·10 [-0·17 to 0·38], p=0·46 in evoke+). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 1729 (91·2%) of 1896 participants receiving semaglutide versus 1613 (84·8%) of 1902 receiving placebo. There were five fatalities considered treatment-related by the investigators (one in the semaglutide group and four in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Oral semaglutide was not efficacious in slowing clinical progression in participants with early Alzheimer's disease. Safety and tolerability of semaglutide in early Alzheimer's disease is consistent with studies in other indications. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

References

1. 1.Cummings, J. L., Atri, A., Sano, M., Zetterberg, H., Scheltens, P., Knop, F. K., Johannsen, P., Wichmann, C. A., Abschneider, R. M., Leon, T., & Feldman, H. H. (2026). Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide 14 mg (flexible dose) in early-stage symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (evoke and evoke+): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet, 397(10284), 1345-1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00459-9