Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants for perioperative management of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Women undergoing cesarean section under single-shot spinal anesthesia |
| I — Intervention | Intrathecal adjuvants (buprenorphine, diamorphine, morphine, dexmedetomidine, etc.) combined with local anesthetics |
| C — Comparator | Placebo or local anesthetic alone |
| O — Outcomes | Pain intensity at 24 hours, duration of effective analgesia, opioid consumption, motor block duration, adverse events |
Bottom Line
This comprehensive network meta-analysis of 166 RCTs involving nearly 15,000 women found that while intrathecal adjuvants did not significantly reduce cesarean section pain at 24 hours, several agents (particularly morphine alone or in combination) significantly prolonged effective analgesia and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine also prolonged motor block duration. The safety profile was generally acceptable with no significant increase in severe adverse events. However, the authors acknowledge the evidence quality is very low to low, limiting clinical recommendations. For Australian practice, these findings support the cautious use of established intrathecal adjuvants like morphine for cesarean section, but emphasize the need for individualized risk-benefit assessment and further high-quality research to strengthen the evidence base.
Key Findings
P Value: Not significant for primary outcome
Effect Size: Not reported in abstract
Primary Outcome: Pain intensity at 24 hours - no intervention significantly reduced pain compared to control
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Morphine-based combinations significantly increased analgesia duration and reduced opioid consumption
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
High feasibility as intrathecal adjuvants are commonly available and technique is standard practice Relevant to Australian obstetric anesthesia practice; morphine and dexmedetomidine are TGA-approved and available on PBS for appropriate indications Women undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally, necessitating effective anesthesia management. Single-shot spinal anesthesia has limitations due to its duration and the dose-limiting adverse effects of local anesthetics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal adjuvants combined with local anesthetics in the perioperative management of CS pain. DESIGN: Systematic review with network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library for Clinical Trials, and Embase. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included women undergoing CS under single-shot spinal anesthesia with any intrathecal drug or placebo added to a long-acting local anesthetic. We selected single- or double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English. We excluded crossover, non-randomized, up-and-down dose-finding studies and clinical trials comparing the same drugs in all study arms. RESULTS: We included 166 RCTs with 14 925 patients assigned to 32 interventions. Buprenorphine and diamorphine were the highest-ranked treatments for reducing pain intensity at 24 hours, though not statistically significant. Morphine alone or in combination with meperidine, neostigmine, epinephrine, or nalbuphine significantly increased the duration of effective analgesia and reduced opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine significantly prolonged the motor block duration. The safety profile of intrathecal adjuvants was generally adequate. CONCLUSIONS: While the strength of evidence, overall, was very low to low, our study suggests that while none of the interventions significantly reduced pain intensity at 24 hours, several significantly prolonged effective analgesia and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine prolonged the duration of motor block. None of the intrathecal adjuvants evaluated significantly increased the occurrence of severe adverse events. Future large-scale RCTs are essential to provide more robust evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024479424.
References
- 1.Ollosu, M., Tripodi, V. F., Bonu, A., Cittadini, G., Musu, M., Ippolito, M., Cortegiani, A., Finco, G., & Sardo, S. (2024). Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants for perioperative management of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106345
Related Research
Computer assisted surgery (Abingdon, England)
DMRNet: a dynamic multi-scale residual network for Shamrock view and lumbar plexus segmentation
14 June 2026
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
What Is Included in Pediatric Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and How to Encourage Adoption: A Systematic Review of the Literature
14 June 2026
PloS one
Long term evaluation of the safety and efficacy of local cooling anesthesia during intravitreal injections: The COOL-2 Trial
13 June 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service