Effects of Sleep Deprivation and Neuromodulatory Interventions on Olfactory-Related Brain Function

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: FDR-corrected but specific p-values not reported

• Effect Size: Not reported - only statistical significance mentioned

• Primary Outcome: ALFF and FC changes in olfactory-related brain regions

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable - neuroimaging study without clinical outcomes

• Confidence Interval: Not provided

Clinical Application

Low - requires specialised neuromodulation equipment and expertise. Protocol impractical for routine clinical use Limited relevance to Australian practice. No TGA-approved devices mentioned. Would require specialist sleep medicine or neurology referral if clinically indicated Very limited - young healthy males only. Not applicable to typical clinical populations with sleep or olfactory disorders

Abstract

Sleep deprivation (SD) has been shown to impair sensory functions, including olfactory processing, which may be related to changes in brain activity. This study aims to investigate the effects of SD, short-term sleep recovery (RS), and neuromodulation interventions on the functional activity of olfactory-related brain regions. We hypothesize that these interventions could restore some of the neural activity disrupted by SD, particularly in areas associated with olfactory processing. In this study, 90 male participants first underwent a baseline sleep period of at least 8 h, followed by 36 h of sleep deprivation (SD36h). The participants were randomly assigned to four groups: control group (CON, n = 30, age 20.8 ± 1.6 years), magnetic stimulation group (MS, n = 30, age 21.3 ± 1.6 years), electrical stimulation group (ES, n = 17, age 20.3 ± 0.7 years), and combined stimulation group (CS, n = 13, age 20.8 ± 1.0 years). After SD36h, participants underwent an 8-hour restorative sleep period, before and after completing the 8-hour RS period, additionally received 30 min of MS(MS was applied over the occipital region using a rhythmic gamma magnetic-field device), ES(ES was delivered as tDCS targeting the left DLPFC, anode at F3, cathode at FP1, 2 mA), and CS. All participants underwent three resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) scans: at baseline, after sleep deprivation, and after intervention. This experiment analyzed the Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations (ALFF) and functional connectivity (FC) in olfactory-related regions. ALFF and FC were analyzed using a group (CON/MS/ES/CS) × time (baseline/SD36h/RS) repeated-measures ANOVA with FDR correction, followed by FDR-corrected post-hoc tests for significant main effects. No group × time interaction survived FDR correction for ALFF or FC. For ALFF, a main group effect was observed in Hippocampus_L and Olfactory_R, with the ES (and CS in Olfactory_R) showing lower ALFF than CON and/or MS. For time effects, ALFF in Hippocampus_L was reduced at SD36h and remained lower after RS relative to baseline, while Olfactory_L ALFF was lower after RS than baseline. For FC, main group effects were found in Hippocampus_L and Fusiform_R, with ES and CS showing higher FC than CON and MS. A main time effect cluster with a peak in Cingulum_Mid_R showed reduced FC after SD36h and increased FC after RS, returning to a level not significantly different from baseline. SD disrupts the ALFF and FC in olfactory-related brain regions, while RS can partially restore these functions. Short-term neuromodulation interventions, such as electrical stimulation and combined stimulation, may improve network-level connectivity but are insufficient to fully restore local neural activity.

References

1. 1.Xiang, H., Cao, Q., Zhang, P., Lv, W., Li, T., Liu, F., Zhang, T., Weng, X., & Xu, F. (2026). Effects of sleep deprivation and neuromodulatory interventions on olfactory-related brain function. Brain Topography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2017.03.014